Studying Individual and Family Development: Linking Theory and Research.
By M. O'brien. 2005
94 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Demography, Education
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0bb28504ab3b9c4f4fc74c72b0d9272abefc125d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
- Miloš Kankaraš
- Yue Liang
- J. Suárez‐Álvarez
- Catherine A. Huddleston-Casas
- Lia O'brien
- V. P. Plano Clark
- J. Tudge
- L. Trinder
In Demography
In Education
Citations in the corpus
- Maternal Gate Closing and Gate Opening in Postdivorce Families (2008, methodology): “To date, the evidence for the impact of gate-closing beliefs and behaviors on outcomes in intact families is mixed, with Pleck and Masciadrelli (2004) noting that the evidence is not robust.”
- Mixed Methods Approaches in Family Science Research (2008, background): “Addressing such complexity requires research that is “multidisciplinary, broad in scope, and linked to the contexts in which people live” (O’Brien, 2005, p. 881).”
- Still Misused After All These Years? A Reevaluation of the Uses of Bronfenbrenner's Bioecological Theory of Human Development (2016, background): “O’Brien (2005) contrasted the mismatch between our field’s “contextual and dynamic” worldview (a worldview that involves “a complex system of reciprocal influence”) and research that examines “direct or linear effects of individual or contextual characteristics on some outcome that is described as…”
- Assessment framework of the OECD Study on Social and Emotional Skills (2019, background): “Furthermore, it is not just parent-child relationships that are important but family relationships as they are complex, dynamic and intertwined, where each member influences and is influenced by the other members (Minuchin, 1988[218]; O’Brien, 2005[219]).”