Measuring discrimination facing ethnic minority job applicants: an Irish experiment

129 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Hiring Discrimination: An Overview of (Almost) All Correspondence Experiments Since 2005 (2017, background): “African, Asian, or German (versus native) name Ireland McGinnity & Lunn (2011) - A.4.”
Pointless Diversity Training: Unconscious Bias, New Racism and Agency (2018, unknown): “This has been well documented empirically in WES (recent examples include Harris and Ogbonna, 2015; Hudson et al., 2017; McGinnity and Lunn, 2011).”
Ethnic discrimination in hiring decisions: a meta-analysis of correspondence tests 1990–2015 (2016, unknown): “For instance, in Austria Serbs face the lowest relative call-back rate (1.31), followed by Chinese (1.37), Turks (1.46), and Nigerians (1.98) (Weichselbaumer 2015b; see also McGinnity and Lunn 2011; Booth, Leigh, and Varganova 2012).”
Immigration into Europe: Economic Discrimination, Violence, and Public Policy (2014, background): “…France, in Sweden, and in Germany—favor natives over immigrants from other European Christian-heritage countries ( Jowell & Prescott-Clarke 1970, Firth 1981, Carlsson & Rooth 2007, Carlsson 2010, Duguet et al. 2010, Kass & Manger 2010, McGinnity & Lunn 2011, Larja et al. 2012, Booth et al. 2012).”