The Impact of Intelligence and Institutional Improvements on Economic Growth
By E. Weede, Sebastian Kampf. 2002
211 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0bae15069bb6dbcd62c83c274b6700f7004b885c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Sociology and Political Science
- Niklas Potrafke
- Niclas Berggren
- Rachel L. Mathers
- Christian Bjørnskov
- Richard Lynn
- T. Vanhanen
- Claudia R. Williamson
- H. Rindermann
Citations in the corpus
- The Assessment of 21st Century Skills in Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Complex and Collaborative Problem Solving (2015, background): “Furthermore, the constructs are also used as prominent and established markers to assess, analyze, and address HC issues on an individual level (e.g., Barrick &Mount, 1991; Hogan & Holland, 2003; Jones & Schneider, 2006; Seibert & Kraimer, 2001; Weede & Kämpf, 2002).”
- How Does Social Trust Affect Economic Growth (2012, background): “Either way, as a first potential mechanism trust might therefore lead to growth as schooling is often found to be a significant growth factor (Barro, 1991; Temple, 2001; Weede and Kämpf, 2002).”
- Intelligence, Human Capital, and Economic Growth: A Bayesian Averaging of Classical Estimates (BACE) Approach (2005, unknown): “Two published studies have used LV’s data in growth regressions: Weede and Kampf (2002) and Volken (2003).”
- The g‐factor of international cognitive ability comparisons: the homogeneity of results in PISA, TIMSS, PIRLS and IQ‐tests across nations (2007, background): “T he consequences of different national cognitive ability levels on the development of their societies need to be researched (as has been done for economic questions; e.g. Lynn & Vanhanen, 2002; Weede & Kämpf, 2002).”
- Economic freedom, culture, and growth (2011, background): “1 For example, Gwartney et al. (1996), Dawson (1998), Gwartney et al. (1999, 2004), De Haan and Sturm (2000), Carlsson and Lundstrom (2002), Weede and Kampf (2002) , Bengoa and Sanchez-Robles (2003), Berggren (2003), Berggren and Jordahl (2005), Weede (2006), Bjornskov (2007, 2009).”
- Market oriented institutions and policies and economic growth: A critical survey (2006, unknown): “The basic problem is that various components may provide some information on an unobservable variable called EF. From this perspective, a latent-variable approach is therefore preferable (see Wansbeek and Meijer, 2000, for an excellent discussion).11 The various”
- The Benefits of Economic Freedom: A Survey (2003, background): “The latter result is also obtained by Dawson (1998), Pitlik (2002) and by Weede and Kämpf (2002).”
- A systematic literature review of the average IQ of sub-Saharan Africans (2010, unknown): “…Harvey, & Nyborg, 2009; Meisenberg, 2004; Morse, 2006; Ram, 2007; Rindermann, 2006, 2007, 2008a,b; Rindermann & Meisenberg, in press; Rushton & Templer, in press; Shatz, 2008; Templer, 2008; Templer & Arikawa, 2006a,b; Voracek, 2004; Weede & Kampf, 2002; Whetzel & McDaniel, 2006; Woodley, 2009).”
- The Economics of International Differences in Educational Achievement (2010, unknown): “cross-country analyses that extensively control for family-background and school-input factors at the student level have confirmed this result for the 1995 TIMSS tests (Woessmann (2001, 2003b)), the 1999 TIMSS-Repeat tests (Woessmann (2003a)), the 2000 PISA tests (Woessmann (2005c); Fuchs and Woessm”
- Intelligence and corruption (2012, background): “The direct positive effect of intelligence on economic growth (Jones and Schneider, 2006; Weede and Kämpf, 2002) is thus accompanied by an indirect effect working through the reduction of corruption.”
- National IQs: A Review of Their Educational, Cognitive, Economic, Political, Demographic, Sociological, Epidemiological, Geographic and Climatic Correlates. (2012, background): “This conclusion may be surprising to economists because theoretically it would be expected that low IQ countries would have faster economic growth rates than high IQ countries because of what Weede and Kampf (2002) call “the advantage of backwardness”.”