Social Connection Through Joint Action and Interpersonal Coordination

By Kerry L. Marsh, Michael J. Richardson, Richard C. Schmidt. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2009

571 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0b90ae1359dd4802c1ca37f81d10bcbbd2bcb04e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

The Phenomenology of Joint Action: Self-Agency vs. Joint-Agency (2012, background): “There is also evidence (Marsh et al., 2009; Richardson et al., 2007b) that synchrony and motor entrainment lead to greater feelings of connection among coagents, fostering a sense of teamness or, as McNeill (1995) calls it, a heightening of fellow feeling.”
Synchrony and destructive obedience (2012, background): “This condition could be considered anti-phase coordination (Marsh et al., 2009; Miles et al., 2010).”
The interactive brain hypothesis (2012, background): “Interpersonal coordination can happen at the level of bodily movement (Richardson et al., 2007; Marsh et al., 2009; Shockley et al., 2009, etc.), posture (Varlet et al., 2011), physiological variables, such as heart rates and breathing patterns (McFarland, 2001; Müller and Lindenberger, 2011),…”
The antecedents and consequences of human behavioral mimicry. (2013, background): “…(see below), suggesting that both reliably serve the goal of interpersonal coordination more broadly, which is to facilitate and regulate the numerous and complex social interactions people navigate daily (Chartrand & van Baaren 2009, Knoblich & Sebanz 2006, Lakin et al. 2003, Marsh et al. 2009).”
Language as a Tool for Interacting Minds (2010, background): “Rather, each participant must take different roles and do quite different things in relation to the overall project, and their success largely depends on well-coordinated, spatio-temporal orchestration of distributed acts in relation to each other, the object they carry, and the physical environment”
Toward You (2010, background): “Alternatively, reversal in kinematic patterning might be interpreted as the result of nonintentional interpersonal alignment, by which individuals acting together tend to automatically coordinate their goal-directed actions (Marsh et al., 2009).”
Psychological research on joint action: Theory and data (2011, background): “Two separate agents may start to act as a single coordinated entity (Marsh et al., 2009; Spivey, 2007) because common processes in the individual agents are driven by the same cues and motor routines.”
Communicative Interactions Improve Visual Detection of Biological Motion (2011, background): “As dynamical principles constrain the coordination of interpersonal movements, the actions of one agent can serve as predictors for the expected actions of the other agent [7].”
Complex dynamical systems in social and personality psychology: theory, modeling, and analysis (2014, unknown): “For example, many dynamical systems approaches explicitly avoid the use of mental representations, and instead focus on perceptionaction couplings as a basis for understanding social and human behavior (e.g., Marsh et al., 2009; Richardson et al., 2009).”
Adaptive Coordination Strategies for Human-Robot Handovers (2015, background): “Such awareness and adaptivity are critical to team performance [26] and the psychological consequences of the interaction [20].”