Educational Neuromyths Among Teachers in Latin America
By E. Gleichgerrcht, Benjamín Lira Luttges, F. Salvarezza, Anna Lucia Campos. 2015
117 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0b0706452e940632246c93b9cd3e1cade3f5579d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
In Statistics and Probability
Citations in the corpus
- Maybe they’re born with it, or maybe it’s experience: Toward a deeper understanding of the learning style myth. (2020, background): “These findings support previous work showing that educators are equally susceptible to neuroeducational myths (e.g., Dekker et al., 2012; Dündar & Gündüz, 2016; Gleichgerrcht et al., 2015; Morehead et al., 2016).”
- How Common Is Belief in the Learning Styles Neuromyth, and Does It Matter? A Pragmatic Systematic Review (2020, background): “), by word of mouth, and via email invitations to databases of people who had previously enquired about information/courses on neuroscience and education” (Gleichgerrcht et al., 2015).”