Event-related potential studies of attention.

By Steven J. Luck, Geoffrey F. Woodman, Edward K. Vogel. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2000

1,178 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0af7df7b526ee763255f66bde445f46aa4bddbda

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

Citations in the corpus

ERP Components: The Ups and Downs of Brainwave Recordings (2011, background): “For example, ERPs were able to end a long-standing debate in the attention literature about whether attention operates at an early stage or a late stage of processing (for reviews, see Hillyard et al., 1998 ; Luck et al., 2000 ).”
Emotion and attention: event-related brain potential studies. (2006, background): “with the attentional blink paradigm indicates that the LPP might reflect a gateway to conscious recognition (Luck et al., 2000; Kranczioch et al., 2003).”
The facilitated processing of threatening faces: an ERP analysis. (2004, background): “Thus, acknowledging the need to distinguish between the various stages of information processing (cf. Cacioppo, Gardner, & Berntson, 1999; Luck et al., 2000), the present measure specifically isolates perceptual processing.”
Electrophysiological correlates of rapid spatial orienting towards fearful faces. (2004, neutral): “In contrast, previous electrophysiological studies did not find any modulation of the striate C1 component by traditional manipulation of spatial attention using endogenous cueing or unstructured, meaningless exogenous cues (Hillyard and AnlloVento, 1998; Luck et al., 2000).”
Event-related potentials to schematic faces in social phobia (2007, background): “The P1 is known to be attention-sensitive (see Mangun, 1995 ; Luck, Woodman, & Vogel, 2000 , for a reviews), and modulated by personal affective judgement of faces as liked or disliked (Pizzagalli, Regard, & Lehmann, 1999 ).”
Theories and measurement of visual attentional processing in anxiety (2008, background): “Although it is clear that selection can occur at multiple levels in the visual system (Luck et al., 2000), the preponderance of evidence suggests that, consistent with early selection theories, objects that do not receive perceptual-level attention are not processed to the level of meaning.”
Affective picture processing: an integrative review of ERP findings. (2008, methodology): “, 2001), as well as the evidence from non-affective ERPs that correlate with visuo-spatial attention (Hillyard and Anllo-Vento, 1998; Luck et al., 2000; Mangun and Hillyard, 1991; Mangun et al., 1993; McDonald et al., 2005), will contribute to a theoretical synthesis of ERP findings on attention, pe”
To See or Not to See: Pre-stimulus Alpha Phase Predicts Visual Awareness (2009, background): “These phenomena resemble the upregulation of these visual ERP components by attention (Luck et al., 2000) and are consistent with a brain state Figure 4.”