ERP Components: The Ups and Downs of Brainwave Recordings
By Emily S. Kappenman, Steven J. Luck. 2011
159 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2cafe7827bf0cb6898294ac5286be7225d5d2d89
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Emily S. Kappenman
- Markus Junghöfer
- Andreas Keil
- Gregory A. Miller
- Stefan Debener
- Steven J. Luck
- Phan Luu
- Gabriele Gratton
Citations in the corpus
- The reward positivity: from basic research on reward to a biomarker for depression. (2015, unknown): “The utility of PCA is emphasized when one appreciates that the negative and positive deflections in the scalp-recorded ERP reflect overlapping neural processes and do not themselves index specific brain processes (Kappenman & Luck, 2012).”
- Committee report: publication guidelines and recommendations for studies using electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography. (2014, methodology): “For example, a change in the relative amplitudes or latencies of two underlying components that overlap in time can cause a shift in the latency of scalp peaks (see Donchin & Heffley, 1978; Kappenman & Luck, 2012a).”