The facilitated processing of threatening faces: an ERP analysis.

By Harald T. Schupp, A. Ohman, Markus Junghöfer, A. Weike, Jessica Stockburger, Alfons O. Hamm. Emotion, 2004

836 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7f30b702bec4e2e2aaab4d8bcd5f58faf40d3a0f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

Citations in the corpus

The face wins: Stronger automatic processing of affect in facial expressions than words in a modified Stroop task (2008, background): “For example, in event-related brain potential studies, early visual attention has been shown to be modulated by pleasant and unpleasant pictures (Schupp et al., 2003) and early posterior negativity has been shown to occur for threat faces compared to non-threat faces (Schupp et al., 2004).”
Emotion and attention: event-related brain potential studies. (2006, methodology): “For instance, focusing on the fear system, we re cently obtained evidence that threatening faces are associated with increased EPN and LPP amplitudes compared to neutral and friendly faces (Schupp et al., 2004c). experience.”
Emotional facial expressions evoke faster orienting responses, but weaker emotional responses at neural and behavioural levels compared to scenes: A simultaneous EEG and facial EMG study (2016, neutral): “…compared to neutral (Leppänen et al., 2008; Stekelenburg and de Gelder, 2004) and happy expressions (Herbert et al., 2013b; Mühlberger et al., 2009; Schupp et al., 2004b), and enhanced EPN negativity for positive scenes compared to negative and neutral scenes (Bublatzky and Schupp, 2011; Franken…”
The discrimination of angry and fearful facial expressions in 7-month-old infants: An event-related potential study (2008, background): “Facial expressions convey emotional information during social interactions that help people to interpret the internal states and the intentions of others (Schupp et al, 2004 ).”
Event-related potentials to schematic faces in social phobia (2007, background): “In the earlier studies (Eimer & Holmes, 2002; Holmes et al., 2003; Schupp et al., 2004b), the detection of the facial emotion was not explicitly task relevant.”
Event-Related Potentials, Emotion, and Emotion Regulation: An Integrative Review (2010, background): “For instance, Schupp and colleagues presented visual stimuli for 120 to 333 msec and found an increased LPP up to 300 msec after picture offset (Schupp et al., 2004a; Schupp et al., 2007).”
Interpretive bias in social phobia: An ERP study with morphed emotional schematic faces (2009, result): “Presumably, such an emotional modulation of the N170 is only present when the identification of the facial emotion is explicitly task relevant, which might explain why some studies did not observe such an effect (Eimer & Holmes, 2002 ; Holmes, Vuilleumier, & Eimer, 2003 ; Schupp et al, 2004 ).”
Not all emotions are created equal: the negativity bias in social-emotional development. (2008, background): “There is also recent neuroscientific evidence for a negativity bias (e.g., Ito, Larsen, Smith, & Cacioppo, 1998; Schupp et al., 2004).”