The concept of social care and the analysis of contemporary welfare states.

By M. Daly, J. Lewis. British Journal of Sociology, 2000

975 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0a96784b57bc747447e91d83e58cb7a3094fc0e6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. C. Jensen
2. C. Bambra
3. M. Kautto
4. T. Kröger
5. Jane Lewis
6. Nadia Steiber
7. Barbara Haas
8. P. Scheepers

In Political Science and International Relations

1. C. Jensen
2. C. Bambra
3. M. Kautto
4. T. Kröger
5. Jane Lewis
6. Nadia Steiber
7. Barbara Haas
8. A. Barrientos

Citations in the corpus

• ‘So that's how I found out I was a young carer and that I actually had been a carer most of my life’. Identifying and supporting hidden young carers (2011, background): “…the way in which the caring tasks undertaken by young carers are embedded within a normative framework of familial obligation and responsibility (Daly and Lewis 2000, Bittman et al. 2004, Moore and McArthur 2007, O’Connor 2007), which serves to obscure the nature of those responsibilities.”
• Gender and welfare state change1 (2002, background): “Care work crosses the boundaries between informal and formal, public and private, and paid and unpaid work (Daly and Lewis 1998, 2000), and yet it has never become an organizing concept for the analysis of social policies in the mainstream literature, and has certainly never become the centre of…”
• Worlds of welfare services and transfers (2008, background): “…paid to the effect of the different regime types on gender issues such as female labour market participation (Orloff, 1993; Daly, 1994; Siaroff, 1994; Daly and Lewis, 2000).2 Researchers have paid considerable attention to all these issues during the last decade or so (Arts and Gelissen, 2002;…”
• Advances in explaining women's employment patterns (2012, background): “…to the different degrees of state support for continuous female employment (Lewis 1992; Ostner & Lewis 1995; O'Connor et al. 1999; Sainsbury 1999; Daly & Lewis 2000; Siim 2000), while the latter claim that national differences in work/care arrangements can be explained by differences in the…”
• Investing in services in West European welfare states (2002, background): “…suggested it is precisely social services that may account for the greatest differences between welfare states (Sipilä, 1997; Castles, 1998), and Daly and Lewis (2000) have rightfully argued that a focus on both cash and service dimensions of welfare states could lead to a more encompassing…”
• Welfare States And Dimensions Of Social Capital: Cross-national Comparisons Of Social Contacts In European Countries (2002, background): “Moreover, Daly and Lewis (2000) state that the Scandinavian countries tend to collectivize caring.”
• Cash Versus Services: ‘Worlds of Welfare’ and the Decommodification of Cash Benefits and Health Care Services (2005, background): “It will be more fruitful if future attempts at welfare state modelling combined both cash and services (Daly and Lewis, 2000).”
• Care research and disability studies: Nothing in common? (2009, background): “…to question the conceptual boundaries between unpaid informal care and paid formal care, as well as those between care for older/disabled people and care for children; as a result they have called for a non-fragmented concept of care (e.g. Ungerson, 1990, 1995; Thomas, 1993; Daly and Lewis, 2000).”