Advances in explaining women's employment patterns

169 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Putting the Child-Centred Investment Strategy to the Test: Evidence for the EU27: (2013, background): “The relationship between childcare use and maternal employment is presumably reciprocal: availability of childcare services gives mothers of young children a better option to engage in paid employment which in turn will induce a higher need for childcare places (Steiber and Haas, 2012).”
The Matthew effect in childcare use: a matter of policies or preferences? (2018, background): “Previous research has shown that parents with more traditional attitudes regarding motherhood and employment are less likely to work and to use formal childcare (Steiber and Haas 2012).”
Institutions and the prevalence of nonstandard employment (2015, background): “Income taxation systems also determine the prevalence of part-time work (Dingeldey, 2001; Rubery, 2001, p. 153; Jaumotte, 2004; Dearing et al., 2007; OECD, 2010b; Steiber and Haas, 2012).”
Why do occupations dominated by women pay less? How ‘female-typical’ work tasks and working-time arrangements affect the gender wage gap among higher education graduates (2016, background): “Thus, the ‘choice’ to work in an occupation with ‘female-typical’ working-time arrangements is not necessarily the result of women’s personal preferences, but a consequence of the division of labour within couples and (the absence of) institutional support for combining wage work with care work (Nie”