The utilization of e‐government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors *
By Lemuria D. Carter, France Bélanger. Information Systems Journal, 2005
2,371 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Information Systems and Management, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0a954386b36717010e3b07391da43916afa72ad1
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Information Systems and Management
- Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi
- Nripendra P. Rana
- Ali Abdallah Alalwan
- Michael D. Williams
- Yi-Shun Wang
- V. Venkatesh
- James Y. L. Thong
- Frank K. Y. Chan
In Political Science and International Relations
- Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi
- Nripendra P. Rana
- V. Venkatesh
- James Y. L. Thong
- Yi-Shun Wang
- Apetogbo Komlan Aklikokou
- Lijun Chen
- Suha A. AlAwadhi
In Sociology and Political Science
- Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi
- Nripendra P. Rana
- Ali Abdallah Alalwan
- Michael D. Williams
- Yi-Shun Wang
- V. Venkatesh
- James Y. L. Thong
- Frank K. Y. Chan
Citations in the corpus
- Impact of Trust and Privacy Concerns on Technology Acceptance in Healthcare: An Indian Perspective (2020, positive): “Studies have supported trust as a vital construct for predicting acceptance of technology [18]; [42]; [89]; [91].”
- Trust and Electronic Government Success: An Empirical Study (2008, background): “Hence, there are two dimensions of citizen’s trusting beliefs toward an e-government Web site—trust in government and trust in technology [11, 65].”
- Expanding the Technology Acceptance Model with the Inclusion of Trust, Social Influence, and Health Valuation to Determine the Predictors of German Users’ Willingness to Continue using a Fitness App: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach (2018, background): “…continuance intention, supporting findings of various studies into the impact of the two constructs on the adoption of various forms of technology (e.g. Carter & Belanger, 2005; Chau & Lai, 2003; Gefen et al., 2003; Kwon & Wen, 2010; Wu & Wang, 2005) and, specifically, on people ’ s inclination to…”
- Determinants of end-user acceptance of biometrics: Integrating the "Big 3" of technology acceptance with privacy context (2013, background): “Compatibility has also been shown to contribute significantly to the accurate prediction of acceptance intent [9].”
- Augmenting the Technology Acceptance Model with Trust: Commercial Drivers’ Attitudes towards Monitoring and Feedback (2012, background): “In the context of e-commerce and e-government, it has been shown that trust in the e-vendor can influence intentions to transact on a website (Carter & Bélanger, 2005; Pavlou, 2003).”
- Investigating acceptance of telemedicine services through an extended technology acceptance model (TAM) (2020, background): “These models have been verified multiple times to determine their effectiveness for many information technology-based applications [26].”
- Managing Citizens' Uncertainty in E-Government Services: The Mediating and Moderating Roles of Transparency and Trust (2016, background): “2011)—have been used to examine factors affecting citizens’ adoption and use of a variety of e-government services, such as government websites (Barnes and Vidgen 2004), electronic tax filing (Carter and Belanger 2005), electronic voting systems (Yao and Murphy 2007), and general electronic public s”
- Extending the two‐stage information systems continuance model: incorporating UTAUT predictors and the role of context (2011, background): “Furthermore, based on prior relevant research (Carter & Bélanger, 2005; Pavlou & Fygenson, 2006), post-usage trust will have a positive influence on continuance intention, in addition to its indirect effect via post-usage attitude.”
- The imperative of influencing citizen attitude toward e-government adoption and use (2015, methodology): “This pressing problem needs urgent research attention since the success of e-government is highly dependent upon citizens’ adoption and use of e-government services (Carter & Bélanger, 2005; Ozkan & Kanat, 2011; Panagiotopoulos et al., 2012).”
- Extending the Technology Acceptance Model to assess automation (2011, background): “Trust has also been considered as a direct determinant of BI, accounting for substantial variation in user adoption of e-government (Carter and Bélanger 2005).”
- Investigating the Importance of Trust on Adopting an Autonomous Vehicle (2015, background): “Previous studies have confirmed that trust is a major construct for predicting the adoption of automation (Carter & Bélanger, 2005; Gefen et al., 2003; Lee & Moray, 1992, 1994; Lee & See, 2004; Parasuraman et al., 2008; Pavlou, 2003).”