Offender rehabilitation and treatment : effective programmes and policies to reduce re-offending

By James McGuire. 2002

221 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0a53b3c64a0a36e984a5d67159da3942a142a0df

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Tony Ward
2. Theresa A. Gannon
3. F. McNeill
4. A. Day
5. Demetra Andrews
6. J. Bonta
7. J. Wormith
8. R. Mann

Citations in the corpus

• The good lives model of offender rehabilitation: Clinical implications (2007, result): “It is clear that the RNM, and related RP model, have resulted in effective therapy and lowered recidivism rates (Andrews and Bonta, 1998; Hanson et al., 2002; Hollin, 1999; McGuire, 2002).”
• The Recent Past and Near Future of Risk and/or Need Assessment (2006, background): “D. A. Andrews James Bonta J. Stephen Wormith The history of risk assessment in criminal justice has been written on several occasions (Andrews & Bonta, 2003; Clements, 1996; Hollin, 2002).”
• The good lives model and conceptual issues in offender rehabilitation (2004, background): “In this respect, cognitive skills programmes represent an excellent example of a readiness intervention, alongside motivational interviewing (McGuire, 2002)”
• Brief anger management programs with offenders: Outcomes and predictors of change (2005, methodology): “Cognitive behavioural treatments have become widely accepted in the last decade of the 20th century and the early years of the 21st century as the method of choice in the attempt to reduce recidivism and reconviction in offenders using psychological interventions (Hollin, 2001; McGuire, 2002, 2004).”
• Evaluating offending behaviour programmes (2008, background): “Following dissemination of the ‘What Works?’ research (McGuire, 1995, 2002), offending behaviour programmes have been adopted in England and Wales by both the prison and probation services.”
• Sources of Variability in Estimates of Predictive Validity (2011, background): “Applying the issue of efficacy versus effectiveness (McGuire, 2002) or concept of demonstration versus practical project (Lipsey, 1999) in correctional treatment and general psychotherapy to the domain of predictive validity, our starting point is that samples that yield strong validity estimates…”
• The place of the officer-offender relationship in assisting offenders to desist from crime (2005, background): “For example, Lipton et al. (2002) suggest that, in addition to cognitive-behavioural work, programmes should provide pro-social modelling with positive reinforcement of non-criminal behaviour and attitudes; self-efficacy and social support, and motivational interviewing – all elements in common…”
• Therapeutic jurisprudence and responsivity: Finding the will and the way in offender rehabilitation (2004, background): “Influencing current models of rehabilitation is the work of correctional researchers regarding ‘‘what works’’ (e.g. Gendreau, 1996; Andrews and Bonta, 1998; McGuire, 2002).”