When is Sustainable Forestry Sustainable? The Forest Stewardship Council in Argentina and Brazil
By R. Espach. Global Environmental Politics, 2006
125 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0a3aab53370d0eeda78a6c49fbd87878870031ce
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Global and Planetary Change
In Strategy and Management
Citations in the corpus
- Voluntary Environmental Programs: A Comparative Perspective. (2012, background): “If this is indeed correct, then VEPs might hold substantial promise in developing countries where governments’ capacity to make and enforce regulations is weak and the culture of compliance among firms is not well established (Espach, 2006; Graham & Woods, 2006; Kerret, 2008; Börzel & Risse, 2010).”
- Private Global Business Regulation (2008, background): “Although most studies of private forestry regulation focus on their role in developed countries, Espach (2006) analyzes the acceptance of FSC standards in two developing countries, namely Argentina and Brazil.”
- From governance to government: The strengthened role of state bureaucracies in forest and agricultural certification (2016, background): “In this sense, bureaucracies could enhance certification schemes by funding programme participation, promoting certification through public procurement policies or by applying certification standards to their own practices (Espach, 2006).”