The Cognitive-Affective-Conative Model of Destination Image: A Confirmatory Analysis
By Dora Agapito, Patrícia Oom do Valle, Júlio da Costa Mendes. 2013
420 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Marketing, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0a0f5d161cbc5dd5131bdad1a0bc9f22ce8b11b3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Marketing
- D. Stylidis
- K. Woosnam
- Youngjoon Choi
- Jong-Hyeong Kim
- Guy Assaker
- Choong‐Ki Lee
- Milan Ivkov
- Patrícia Oom do Valle
In Sociology and Political Science
- D. Stylidis
- K. Woosnam
- Milan Ivkov
- Guy Assaker
- Jong-Hyeong Kim
- Choong‐Ki Lee
- Youngjoon Choi
- Nikolaos Stylos
Citations in the corpus
- The Impact of Memorable Tourism Experiences on Loyalty Behaviors: The Mediating Effects of Destination Image and Satisfaction (2018, background): “First, researchers have found that DI directly affects tourists’ intention to revisit and willingness to recommend the destination to others (Agapito et al. 2013; Hallmann et al. 2015; Kock, Josiassen, and Assaf 2016).”
- Effects of Place Attachment and Image on Revisit Intention in an Ecotourism Destination: Using an Extended Model of Goal-Directed Behavior (2020, result): “, affective, cognitive, and conative image) has been supported in previous studies [40].”
- Effects of tourism information quality in social media on destination image formation: The case of Sina Weibo (2017, background): “On the basis of Gartner’s (1993) destination image formation theory, Baloglu and McCleary (1999) and Agapito et al. (2013) provided empirical evidence on their interrelated relationships.”
- Explaining conative destination image through cognitive and affective destination image and emotional solidarity with residents (2020, result): “The study findings are largely in line with the vast majority of previous research with regards to the hierarchical nature of the relationships between the cognitive, affective and conative image (Agapito et al., 2013; Stylidis et al., 2017).”
- Destination loyalty explained through place attachment, destination familiarity and destination image (2020, methodology): “Following previous research (Agapito et al., 2013; Kim, Choe, & Petrick, 2018), loyalty was captured using three items: planned intention to revisit (“How likely are you to visit Greece in the next 2 years?”)”
- Using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling in Tourism Research (2016, background): “…(2010); Zach and Racherla (2011); Battour, Battor, and Ismail (2012); Kim, Chung, Lee, and Kim (2012) ; Regan, Carlson, and Rosenberger III (2012); Agapito, Valle, and Mendes (2013); Cheng and Loi (2014) Journal of Travel Research 8 Hernández-Maestro, Muñoz-Gallego, and Santos-Requejo (2009);…”
- Destination images, holistic images and personal normative beliefs: Predictors of intention to revisit a destination (2016, background): “Moreover, given the relatively unstable nature of conative and affective images, decision makers need to track them constantly in order to adjust their marketing strategies (Agapito et al., 2013).”