Nonresponse and Online Student Evaluations of Teaching: Understanding the Influence of Salience, Fatigue, and Academic Environments
By M. Adams, Paul D. Umbach. 2012
211 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/09cfb1527abad94f97a77b8ae82154143c59a3ee
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
In Social Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- Measuring teaching quality in higher education: assessing selection bias in course evaluations (2017, background): “…rate at the institution we consider is at the higher end of the typical online SET response range of 30–50 % reported in other studies (e.g. see Adams and Umbach 2012; Layne et al. 1999; Nulty 2008; Spooren et al. 2013): this suggests that, if anything, more selection bias may be found in…”
- How Important are High Response Rates for College Surveys? (2016, background): “In addition, others have found that increased online surveying to elicit teacher evaluations from college students corresponded with eventual decreased participation (Adams & Umbach, 2012).”