Developing Chinese scientists' skills for publishing in English: evaluating collaborating-colleague workshops based on genre analysis

By Margaret Cargill, Patrick O'Connor. 2006

114 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Literature and Literary Theory

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/09bdd4e49c1ae6b647a22f5ac2149b3d64473b51

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Literature and Literary Theory

1. J. Flowerdew
2. Yongyan Li
3. B. Kwan

Citations in the corpus

• The Non-Anglophone Scholar on the Periphery of Scholarly Publication. (2007, background): “This would mean encouraging greater provision of academic writing programmes and support facilities (Benfield and Feak 2006; Cargill and O’Connor 2006; Curry and Lillis 2004; Lillis and Curry 2006).”
• Scholarly writers who use English as an Additional Language: What can Goffman's ''Stigma'' tell us? (2008, background): “These scholars include writers who are sympathetic to the predicament of EAL writers in general (e.g., Ammon, 2000; Canagarajah, 1996, 2002; Cargill & O’Connor, 2006; Flowerdew, 1999a, 1999b, 2001; Swales, 2004), proponents of World Englishes as a possible more inclusive way forward (e.g., Jenkins,…”
• Shaping Chinese novice scientists' manuscripts for publication (2007, background): “Our longer term plan is to ensure that the growing contribution of Chinese science is fully reflected in our services both inside and outside China and that we are able to operate as partners to Chinese scientists in improving visibility, influence and ultimately, also, the productivity of science.”