Communication networks: social environments for receiving and signalling behaviour

By P. McGregor, T. Peake. Acta Ethologica, 2000

289 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental Biology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/09b425c1c841f17517b216f3f8d037b62cf5210a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental Biology

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Citations in the corpus

Female Japanese quail that ‘eavesdrop’ on fighting males prefer losers to winners (2003, background): “As suggested by the preceding examples, studies of eavesdropping have focused on the consequences of observing aggressive interactions between males, although eavesdropping on other sorts of interaction might also affect the subsequent behaviour of eavesdroppers ( McGregor & Peake 2000 ).”
The Behavioral Ecology of Anuran Communication (2007, background): “Anuran choruses allow for the exchange of information between numerous signalers and receivers, and choruses can be considered “communication networks” (McGregor and Peake 2000; Grafe 2005), rich in “public information” (Valone and Templeton 2002; Danchin et al. 2004).”
Acoustic preferences and localization performance of blood-sucking flies (Corethrella Coquillett) to túngara frog calls (2006, background): “In reproductive displays, it has been shown that unintended receivers or ‘‘eavesdroppers’’ use sexual signals to obtain information about the signaler (reviewed in Zuk and Kolluru 1998; McGregor and Peake 2000).”
Animal Communication Networks: Behaviours specific to communication networks (2005, background): “Several important experiments had been published around the time of our conversation, demonstrating that animals extract information from signaling interactions between others (i.e. eavesdropping; McGregor & Peake 2000).”
Cost of mobbing call to breeding pied flycatcher, Ficedula hypoleuca (2005, background): “Individuals not directly involved in a signaling interaction can nevertheless gather information from it, and the exploitation of these cues by the receiver is called eavesdropping (McGregor, 1993; McGregor and Dabelsteen, 1996; McGregor and Peake, 2000).”
Habitat structure and the evolution of bird song: a meta-analysis of the evidence for the acoustic adaptation hypothesis (2007, background): “For example, exploitation of sexual signals by parasitic, predator or competitor eavesdroppers ( sensu McGregor & Peake 2000) has been demonstrated for many taxa, including insects (Hoy 1992; Robert, Amoroso & Hoy 1992; Heller 1995; Wagner 1996), amphibians (Ryan, Tuttle & Taft 1981; Ryan, Tuttle &…”
Consequences of complex signaling: predator detection of multimodal cues (2007, background): “This includes cue-reading predators for which the information content could be less important but for whom the signal itself reveals the presence of potential prey (Brenowitz 1982; Bradbury and Vehrencamp 1998; Zuk and Kolluru 1998; McGregor and Peake 2000; Shier 2002).”
EAVESDROPPING AND MATE CHOICE IN FEMALE FIGHTING FISH (2000, background): “This network view of communication has many implications for understanding information transfer between animals (McGregor & Peake, 2000; McGregor et al., in press).”
Audience effect alters mating preferences in a livebearing fish, the Atlantic molly, Poecilia mexicana (2008, unknown): “…visual communication Communication events often occur in a social context, so that information exchange is not binary, but rather several individuals may interact and form communication networks (Oliveira et al. 1998; McGregor & Peake 2000; Earley & Dugatkin 2005; Matos & Schlupp 2005; Peake 2005).”
Where Next? Group Coordination and Collective Decision Making by Primates (2011, background): “received and processed by one or many recipients (McGregor and Peake 2000; Skyrms 2009).”
THE EVOLUTIONARY ECOLOGY OF GYNOGENESIS (2005, background): “Recent studies have established the idea of communication networks (McGregor & Peake 2000).”
Overlapping and matching in the song contests of black-capped chickadees (2004, background): “The cost of being masked also increases in song contests where third-party eavesdroppers are assessing the contestants ( McGregor & Peake 2000 ), (a)”
Antipredator benefits of group living in colonial web-building spiders: the ‘early warning’ effect (2002, unknown): “The matrix of interconnected webbing in colonies of orbweavers allows individuals to share information, similar in some ways to the ‘communication networks’ described by McGregor & Peake (2000) .”
Ultraviolet reflectance affects male-male interactions in the blue tit (Parus caeruleus ultramarinus) (2004, background): “In addition to eavesdropping (McGregor and Peake 2000; Oliveira et al., 1998), phenotypic cues or signals that reliably inform opponents about their asymmetry in quality and affect the probability to win a particular contest might be particularly important to predict the optimal level of aggression.”