Animal Communication Networks: Behaviours specific to communication networks

By P. McGregor. 2005

333 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental Biology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a5e937e70fbe2a4b17f570af7dfe28e131bc46c0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental Biology

1. D. Gil
2. Diego Llusia
3. E. Gillam

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. Diego Llusia
2. D. Gil
3. E. Gillam

In Genetics

1. D. Gil
2. Diego Llusia
3. E. Gillam

Citations in the corpus

• Eavesdropping by bats on the feeding buzzes of conspecifics (2007, background): “Although such an uneven distribution may increase the time an animal must dedicate to foraging (Stephens and Krebs 1986), efforts to locate areas of high resource density may be enhanced by monitoring conspecific cues associated with feeding activity (McGregor 2005).”
• Heterospecific eavesdropping in a nonsocial species (2008, unknown): “Eavesdropping, also known as information parasitism, occurs when an individual other than the intended receiver cues in on public sensory information (McGregor 2005).”
• The Bird Dawn Chorus Revisited (2020, background): “…of predation risk and a decrease in invasion rate (Kacelnik and Krebs 1983), allows ritualization and comparison among signallers (WestEberhard 1979; Zahavi 1980), as well as favours the development of useful communication networks (Burt and Vehrencamp 2005; McGregor 2005; Mennill et al. 2003).”