Habitat structure and the evolution of bird song: a meta-analysis of the evidence for the acoustic adaptation hypothesis

By G. Boncoraglio, N. Saino. 2007

385 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental Biology, Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/40e01c368db4d1f677144ab814a896fc7b7c77ee

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental Biology

1. David A. Luther
2. Peter P. Marra
3. Jenélle Dowling
4. Yang Hu
5. G. C. Cardoso
6. H. Brumm

In Ecology

1. David A. Luther
2. Peter P. Marra
3. Jenélle Dowling
4. Yang Hu
5. G. C. Cardoso
6. D. Ryan Norris
7. Richard T. Holmes
8. Matthew D. Johnson

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. David A. Luther
2. Peter P. Marra
3. Jenélle Dowling
4. Yang Hu
5. G. C. Cardoso
6. H. Brumm
7. Matthew D. Johnson
8. Richard T. Holmes

Citations in the corpus

• Comparative effects of urban development and anthropogenic noise on bird songs (2012, background): “This effect is especially strong for broad bandwidth signals (Boncoraglio and Saino 2007).”
• Are bird species that vocalize at higher frequencies preadapted to inhabit noisy urban areas (2009, methodology): “…vocalizations is generally related to the size of the species (e.g., Ryan and Brenowitz 1985; Wiley 1991) and to the vegetation density of their habitats (Boncoraglio and Saino 2007), but urban and nonurban species did not differ in body mass or in the vegetation density of their nonurban habitats.”