Modeling cascading failures in the North American power grid

By R. Kinney, Paolo Crucitti, Réka Albert, Vito Latora. 2004

715 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract.The North American power grid is one of the most complex technological networks, and its interconnectivity allows both for long-distance power transmission and for the propagation of disturbances. We model the power grid using its actual topology and plausible assumptions about the load and overload of transmission substations. Our results indicate that the loss of a single substation can result in up to $25\%$ loss of transmission efficiency by triggering an overload cascade in the network. The actual transmission loss depends on the overload tolerance of the network and the connectivity of the failed substation. We systematically study the damage inflicted by the loss of single nodes, and find three universal behaviors, suggesting that $40\%$ of the transmission substations lead to cascading failures when disrupted. While the loss of a single node can inflict substantial damage, subsequent removals have only incremental effects, in agreement with the topological resilience to less than $1\%$ node loss.

Subfields: Civil and Structural Engineering, Mathematical Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/098105d22376a8cc9359d7f058b224ed45df1398

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Civil and Structural Engineering

  1. Daqing Li
  2. Boleslaw K. Szymanski
  3. Michael K. Reiter
  4. Peng Ning
  5. Giuliano Andrea Pagani
  6. Yao Liu
  7. Xueming Liu
  8. H. Eugene Stanley

In Mathematical Physics

  1. Boleslaw K. Szymanski
  2. Luciano da Fontoura Costa
  3. Michael K. Reiter
  4. Peng Ning
  5. Giuliano Andrea Pagani
  6. P. R. Villas Boas
  7. Yao Liu
  8. Francisco Aparecido Rodrigues

In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

  1. Matjaz Perc
  2. Manlio De Domenico
  3. Boleslaw K. Szymanski
  4. H. Eugene Stanley
  5. Jianxi Gao
  6. Marc Barthelemy
  7. J. P. Gleeson
  8. Francisco Aparecido Rodrigues

Citations in the corpus