Sequence clustering strategies improve remote homology recognitions while reducing search times.
By Weizhong Li, Lukasz Jaroszewski, Adam Godzik. 2002
70 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Molecular Biology, Spectroscopy
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Molecular Biology
- Jinbo Xu
- Johannes Söding
- David T. Jones
- Yang Zhang
- Vladimir N Uversky
- Burkhard Rost
- Martin Steinegger
- Liam J. McGuffin
In Spectroscopy
- Johannes Söding
- Martin Steinegger
- David T. Jones
- Jinbo Xu
- Philip E. Bourne
- Eric D. Scheeff
- Andrei N. Lupas
- Adam Godzik
Citations in the corpus
- Uniclust databases of clustered and deeply annotated protein sequences and alignments (2016, methodology): “gz: archive containing three files with Pfam, SCOP, and PDB annotations, each formatted as tab-separated lists with nine columns: (1,2) identifiers for query and target, (3-5, 6-8) domain start and end-position and total sequence length for both UniProt and database sequence, (9) HHblits E-value.”
- UniRef clusters: a comprehensive and scalable alternative for improving sequence similarity searches (2014, background): “…of metagenomics data (Foerstner et al., 2008; Wommack et al., 2012), developing large-scale hierarchical clustering algorithms (Loewenstein et al., 2008), studying gene duplication (Rivera et al., 2010) and conducting genomic studies of peptide and oligonucleotide frequencies (Capone et al., 2010).”
- HHsenser: exhaustive transitive profile search using HMM–HMM comparison (2006, background): “This should make HHsenser substantially more sensitive than straightforward implementations of intermediate profile search (14,22,23) (see caption of Figure 2).”
- Clustered Sequence Representation for Fast Homology Search (2007, unknown): “Fourth, profile-based algorithms such as PSI-BLAST (Altschul et al., 1997) can be misled by redundant matches during iteration, causing them to bias the profile towards over-represented domains; this can result in a less sensitive search or even profile corruption (Li et al., 2002; Park et al., 2000).”
- The importance of alignment accuracy for molecular replacement. (2004, methodology): “BLAST searches were performed directly on protein sequences from the PDB. PSI-BLAST searches were executed according to a protocol called PDB-BLAST (Li et al., 2002), in which an iterative PSI-BLAST search is executed against the non-redundant sequence database (NR) and the resulting pro®le is used ”
- Intrinsic disorder in transcription factors. (2006, methodology): “Briefly, we first used CDHIT (Cluster Database at High Identity with Tolerance) program from http://bioinformatics.org/project/?group_id=350 [Li et al., 2001, 2002] to reduce the homology to 80%, and then to 40% sequence identity according to the recommended procedures.”
- Improving sequence-based fold recognition by using 3D model quality assessment (2005, background): “Hard targets are those sequences for which standard methods forhomologydetectionfailtofindanysimilarfolds.”
- Sequencing delivers diminishing returns for homology detection: implications for mapping the protein universe (2010, background): “Received on May 10, 2010; revised on August 31, 2010; accepted on September 10, 2010”
- clusterMaker: a multi-algorithm clustering plugin for Cytoscape (2011, methodology): “There are many approaches to this classification, including machine learning [11-13] (see [11] for a good overview) as well as clustering large groups of proteins based on either sequence or structural similarity metrics [7,8,14-28].”
- Clustering of database sequences for fast homology search using upper bounds on alignment score. (2004, methodology): “[12, 13] presented a method for fast and sensitive homology search by merging database sequences having high sequence identities.”
- Application of protein structure alignments to iterated hidden Markov model protocols for structure prediction (2006, background): “For purposes of homology searches, purging databases of similar sequences does not reduce search performance [45], and in some circumstances may improve performance [46].”