Ownership Concentration and CSR Policy of European Multinational Enterprises

245 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Is Institutional Ownership Related to Corporate Social Responsibility? The Nonlinear Relation and Its Implication for Stock Return Volatility (2015, unknown): “This group of institutions also faces fairly strict fiduciary responsibilities, though not so strict as bank trusts (O’Barr and Conley 1992; Del Guercio 1996).”
A Cross-Country Investigation of Corporate Governance and Corporate Sustainability Disclosure: A Signaling Theory Perspective (2018, unknown): “Moreover, some researchers also document that foreign investors are more interested in profit maximization than social and environmental investment [46].”
Corporate Social Responsibility as a Strategic Shield Against Costs of Earnings Management Practices (2014, methodology): “The CSR information is collected from the EIRIS database.3 This database is widely used in the industry and in academic research, including Brammer et al. (2006), Scholtens and Dam (2007), Louche et al. (2012), Dam and Scholtens (2012) or Fabrizi et al. (2013).”
An Analysis of Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Performance with Moderating Effects of CEO Power and Ownership Structure: A Case Study of the Manufacturing Sector of Pakistan (2019, background): “L Dam and B Scholtens [141] explained that highly concentrated ownership may lead to inferior CSR actions, because shareholders may feel that the ﬁrm provides goods at higher prices.”