The cognitive science of morality : intuition and diversity

By Walter Sinnott-Armstrong. 2008

162 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/08fbeb058acde28312f2e1895c31fc2bcd178924

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Moral competence in social robots (2014, unknown): “[20] J. C. Wright and K. Bartsch, “Portraits of early moral sensibility in two children’s everyday conversations,” Merrill-Palmer Q., vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 56–85, Jan. 2008.”
Order effects in moral judgment (2012, background): “In trolley dilemmas the parameters are highly specified (e.g., a full certainty exists about the set of possible actions and their consequences; Gigerenzer, 2008), which is an uncommon feature in moral dilemmas we might encounter in daily life.”
On dual processing and heuristic approaches to moral cognition (2008, background): “’ The science of heuristics insists that research study social groups in addition to isolated individuals, and natural environments in addition to hypothetical problems (Gigerenzer, 2008).”
Do Social Norms Influence Causal Inferences? (2014, methodology): “According to these studies, people seem to view the behavior of an agent that violates a norm as more causal than one that conforms to norms (Alicke, 1992; Knobe & Fraser, 2008; Knobe & Hitchcock, 2009).”
The Perceived Objectivity of Ethical Beliefs: Psychological Findings and Implications for Public Policy (2010, background): “…recent research we have followed up three questions left unanswered by our initial investigations: (1) Why are some ethical beliefs treated as more objective 6 Although see Gill (2008, 2009) for philosophical critique of this uniformity assumption, and for a defense of meta-ethical variability.”
The Costs and Benefits of Calculation and Moral Rules (2010, unknown): “…and the dictates of CBA (e.g., Baron & Spranca, 1997; Bartels, 2008; Bartels & Medin, 2007; Connolly & Reb, 2003; Fiddick, Spampinato, & Grafman, 2005; Gigerenzer, 2007; Greene, Sommerville, Nystrom, Darley, & Cohen, 2001; Haidt, 2001; Haidt, Koller, & Dias, 1993; Hauser, Cushman, Young, Jin, &…”
Morality shifting in the context of intergroup violence (2012, background): “…and lead to what he called, in his social intuitionist model of morality, moral intuitions: evaluative feelings of right or wrong resulting in automatic moral judgments in the face of transgressions that often precede deliberative, rational processes of moral reasoning (Haidt & Bjorklund, 2008).”