The Perceived Objectivity of Ethical Beliefs: Psychological Findings and Implications for Public Policy

By Geoffrey P. Goodwin, J. Darley. 2010

96 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Information Systems and Management, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/42a54f81ac525d1ec1d7e8370bf118fef0240bc3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Geoffrey P. Goodwin
2. J. Wright
3. Joshua Knobe
4. J. Darley
5. Hugh Mccann
6. Wesley Buckwalter
7. James R. Beebe
8. Tania Lombrozo

In Information Systems and Management

1. Geoffrey P. Goodwin
2. J. Darley

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Geoffrey P. Goodwin
2. J. Wright
3. Joshua Knobe
4. J. Darley
5. Bertram F. Malle
6. Hugh Mccann
7. Adam Feltz
8. James R. Beebe

Citations in the corpus

• Folk Moral Relativism (2011, background): “They were more able to explain alternative views (Goodwin and Darley, 2010) and to be tolerant of people with opposite opinions (Wright, Cullum and Schwab, 2008; Wright, McWhite and Grandjean, 2010).”
• Why are some moral beliefs perceived to be more objective than others (2012, background): “…important individual differences in how objective people are about their moral beliefs (see e.g., Beebe & Sackris, in preparation; Cokely & Feltz, in preparation; Goodwin & Darley, 2008, 2010), the present studies show that the same individual will often regard different Moral Negative acts 1.”