Strategic alliances in the container shipping industry: a global perspective

By B. Slack, C. Comtois, R. McCalla. 2002

231 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/08e4ce569a0b6d137fd2f41760431505fd968a6d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

1. Theo E. Notteboom *
2. A. Pallis
3. F. Parola
4. Daniel Olivier
5. B. Slack
6. A. Frémont
7. G. Satta
8. J.P. Rodrigue

In Strategy and Management

1. Theo E. Notteboom *
2. A. Pallis
3. Daniel Olivier
4. B. Slack
5. F. Parola
6. A. Frémont
7. G. Satta

Citations in the corpus

• The relationship between port choice and terminal involvement of alliance members in container shipping (2017, background): “Along the same lines, Slack et al. (2002) noted that port choice was subject to negotiations among 159”
• Global maritime networks The case of Maersk (2007, background): “This spatial expansion of networks and services was facilitated by cooperation between carriers through the establishment of strategic alliances (Slack et al., 2002) or by acquisition and internal growth (Brooks, 2000).”
• Rethinking the Port (2006, background): “Global shipping networks were increasingly seen to be the outcome of carriers' strategies (Rimmer, 1998; Slack et al, 1996; 2002a).”
• Container Shipping And Ports: An Overview (2004, background): “Co-operation between carriers serves as a means to secure economies of scale, to achieve critical mass in the scale of operation and to spread the high level of risk associated with investments in ships (Ryoo and Thanopoulou, 1999 and Slack et al, 2002).”