The digital divide: the special case of gender

By J. Cooper. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2006

610 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Education, Gender Studies

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/08693bcf110e61e87ada7e0f487e42a212182e15

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

1. Amanda Hinnant
2. Eszter Hargittai
3. Kwok Kee Wei
4. Bernard C. Y. Tan
5. Hock Hai Teo
6. Nicole Kronberger
7. Hock Chuan Chan
8. Markus Appel

In Education

1. Bernard C. Y. Tan
2. Hock Hai Teo
3. Eszter Hargittai
4. Kwok Kee Wei
5. Nicole Kronberger
6. Hock Chuan Chan
7. Markus Appel
8. Amanda Hinnant

In Gender Studies

1. Eszter Hargittai
2. Bernard C. Y. Tan
3. Hock Hai Teo
4. Kwok Kee Wei
5. Nicole Kronberger
6. Hock Chuan Chan
7. Markus Appel
8. Amanda Hinnant

Citations in the corpus

• Digital Inequality (2008, background): “Data about access statistics suggest that the gender divide has disappeared in the United States (Ono & Zavodny, 2003; Wasserman & Richmond-Abbott, 2005), yet scholars looking at more detailed measures of Internet use have noted that men and women are not equally exposed to the medium (Cooper, 2006;”
• Stereotypes and the Achievement Gap: Stereotype Threat Prior to Test Taking (2012, background): “As a consequence, female students may fear being judged as less competent in a y computer-based task which may elicit the detrimental processes and effects of stereo ype threat (see also Cooper, 2006).”
• Conceptualizing and Testing a Social Cognitive Model of the Digital Divide (2011, background): “CSE is generally higher for males than for females (Cassidy and Eachus 2002, Cooper 2006).”