Religiosity, Adult Attachment, and Why "Singles" are More Religious

By P. Granqvist, B. Hagekull. 2000

97 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Health, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/084d777aabb4c2cbe59d4df8fd167d8c955ce01e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Health

1. Lee A. Kirkpatrick
2. P. Granqvist
3. B. Hagekull
4. W. Rowatt
5. John T. Cacioppo
6. Louise C. Hawkley
7. M. Miner
8. V. Saroglou

In Social Psychology

1. Nicholas Epley
2. Lee A. Kirkpatrick
3. Adam Waytz
4. P. Granqvist
5. John T. Cacioppo
6. B. Hagekull
7. W. Rowatt
8. Ann L. McGill

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Nicholas Epley
2. Adam Waytz
3. Lee A. Kirkpatrick
4. John T. Cacioppo
5. P. Granqvist
6. W. Rowatt
7. B. Hagekull
8. Ann L. McGill

Citations in the corpus

• On seeing human: a three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. (2007, background): “…(1927/1961, 1930/1989) suggestion that religion can act as a social buffer against loss, increasing the strength of one's religious beliefs appears to be a useful tactic for coping with loneliness (Rokach & Brock, 1998), divorce (Cain, 1988), or merely being single (Granqvist & Hagekull, 2000).”
• Longitudinal Predictions of Religious Change in Adolescence: Contributions from the Interaction of Attachment and Relationship Status (2003, background): “Indeed, a previous cross-sectional study (Granqvist & Hagekull, 2000) showed that the strength of associations between romantic attachment and religiosity was somewhat increased when the statistical influence of relationship status was partialled out.”
• Two Dimensions of Attachment to God and Their Relation to Affect, Religiosity, and Personality Constructs (2002, background): “Securely attached adults exhibit more stable socialization-based religiosity marked by gradual religious change and adoption of religious beliefs that correspond to those of an attachment figure’s (Granqvist 2002; Granqvist and Hagekull 1999; Granqvist and Hagekull 2000).”
• RESEARCH: "Religious Conversion and Perceived Childhood Attachment: A Meta-Analysis" (2004, result): “This possibility could also help shed light on the discrepancy of findings obtained between the studies on attachment history with parents versus contemporaneous romantic attachment, in relation to religiosity (see also Granqvist, 2002; Granqvist & Hagekull, 2000; Kirkpatrick, 1998, 1999).”