Guest editorial: Anticonsumption attitudes

By S. Zavestoski. 2002

120 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Purpose and object of anti-consumption ☆ (2009, background): “According to Zavestoski (2002b), the lower-level needs (psychological, safety, and belongingness/ love needs) can be met through consumption, but it is much more difficult to buy products directly meeting the higher level needs.”
When do materialistic consumers join commercial sharing systems (2016, background): “From an anti-consumption perspective, not choosing a product is not simply a function of the preference to consume one object over another (Zavestoski, 2002).”
Sufficiency transitions: A review of consumption changes for environmental sustainability (2021, background): “Anticonsumption has been defined as attitudes or reasons against, or a resistance to, consumption (Chatzidakis and Lee, 2013; Zavestoski, 2002).”
Sharing as a form of anti‐consumption? An examination of toy library users (2010, background): “As marketing scholars, we must acknowledge that those who choose to go against consumption, rejecting specific products, brands and organisations, are also stating a preference (Zavestoski, 2002) worthy of study.”