Direct Measurement of Situation Awareness: Validity and Use of SAGAT

502 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Theory and evaluation of human robot interactions (2003, background): “The most common way to measure situational awareness is by direct experimentation using queries [ 8 ].”
Measuring team situation awareness in decentralized command and control environments (2006, methodology): “The most developed method for measuring knowledge-based SA in the human factors/ergonomics literature is the situation awareness global assessment technique (SAGAT) (Endsley 1995 , 2000 ).”
The effects of level of automation and adaptive automation on human performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task (2004, methodology): “Such freezes to collect SAGAT data (or even the possibility of such freezes) have not been found to affect subject performance (Endsley 1995, 2000).”
Prediction in Situation Awareness: Confidence Bias and Underlying Cognitive Abilities (2011, methodology): “Although some have criticized this technique on the basis that participants might expect the questions, and hence perform the primary task differently than they would without SAGAT ( Pew, 2000 ; Sarter & Woods, 1991 ), we echo others who suggest that this is not a substantial concern to the extent ”