Anonymity in the Dictator Game Revisited

By Axel Franzen, Sonja Pointner. 2012

119 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/77aa3d250941f675c6a65f723bc5988be1637b7e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Safety Research

1. Carlos Alós-Ferrer
2. Anja Achtziger
3. Sonja Pointner
4. Axel Franzen
5. Alexander K. Wagner

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Carlos Alós-Ferrer
2. Anja Achtziger
3. Sonja Pointner
4. Axel Franzen
5. Alexander K. Wagner
6. Peter M. Gollwitzer

In Statistics and Probability

1. Sonja Pointner
2. Axel Franzen

Citations in the corpus

• The external validity of giving in the dictator game (2012, background): “…from other studies demonstrates that standard double blind procedures render less anonymity than methods with a random mechanism such as the randomized response technique (Franzen and Pointner 2012) or decision concealment by using a chance mechanism (Dana et al. 2007; Andreoni and Bernheim 2009).”
• Money, depletion, and prosociality in the dictator game (2015, background): “Consequently, dictator giving is strongly reduced if the perception of anonymity is increased (Hoffman, McCabe, Shachat, & Smith, 1994; Charness & Gneezy, 2008; Franzen & Pointner, 2012).”