Destination attachment: Effects on customer satisfaction and cognitive, affective and conative loyalty
By Atìla Yüksel, Fisun Yüksel, Y. Bilim. 2010
1,384 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Geography, Planning and Development, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/06c763e341950dfdd871d7c7ced0c0a3dc54aa87
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Geography, Planning and Development
- K. Woosnam
- D. Stylidis
- Haywantee Ramkissoon
- Sameer Hosany
- Milan Ivkov
- Choong‐Ki Lee
- Manuel Alector Ribeiro
- F. Mavondo
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Heesup Han
- Girish Prayag
- Sameer Hosany
- Sunghyup Sean Hyun
- D. Stylidis
- Kevin Kam Fung So
- Choong‐Ki Lee
- K. Woosnam
In Sociology and Political Science
- K. Woosnam
- Girish Prayag
- D. Stylidis
- Haywantee Ramkissoon
- T. Lee
- Manuel Alector Ribeiro
- Sameer Hosany
- Choong‐Ki Lee
Citations in the corpus
- Satisfaction and revisit intentions at fast food restaurants (2020, background): “Customers desire dining experience to be pleasing; thus, they look for a physical environment quality [31].”
- The Influence of Place Attachment on Social Distance: Examining Mediating Effects of Emotional Solidarity and the Moderating Role of Interaction (2019, background): “While place dependence is more of functional attachment to or reliance on the toured environment (Gross and Brown 2008; Yuksel, Yuksel, and Bilim 2010), place identity highlights the symbolic or emotional attachment to a place (Backlund and Williams 2003).”
- The influence of leisure involvement and place attachment on destination loyalty: Evidence from recreationists walking their dogs in urban parks (2013, background): “Some scholars examined the role of dimensions of place attachment (place dependence and place identity) in the prediction of destination loyalty among tourists in a skiing resort (Alexandris, Kouthouris, &Meligdis, 2006) and a holiday resort (Yüksel et al., 2010).”
- Emotions elicited by local food consumption, memories, place attachment and behavioural intentions (2017, methodology): “Place attachment considers the human– place bond in terms of two dimensions: place identity and place dependence (Yuksel et al., 2010).”
- An exploration of the effects of past experience and tourist involvement on destination loyalty formation (2013, methodology): “The specific items of the tourist satisfaction scale are derived from the universal scale of Oliver (1997), which has been used as a reference in recent studies on tourist satisfaction (e.g. Faullant et al., 2008; Yuksel et al., 2010).”
- Testing the dimensionality of place attachment and its relationships with place satisfaction and pro-environmental behaviours: A structural equation modelling approach (2013, methodology): “For the place attachment construct, four dimensions were included in this study: place dependence (three items), place identity (three items), place affect (three items), and place social bonding (three items) borrowed from Kyle et al., (2004) and Yuksel et al. (2010).”
- The Mediating Effect of Place Attachment on the Relationship between Festival Satisfaction and Loyalty to the Festival Hosting Destination (2012, background): “Recently, Yüksel, Yüksel, and Bilim (2010) demonstrated the utility of place attachment for understanding the satisfaction–loyalty relationship within a holiday destination context.”
- Place-Oriented or People-Oriented Concepts for Destination Loyalty: Destination Image and Place Attachment versus Perceived Distances and Emotional Solidarity (2021, methodology): “…Zhang et al. 2014), place attachment serves a central role owing to its capacity to understand the emotional bonding visitors develop to a destination, which enhances their intention to revisit (Patwardhan et al. 2020; Stylos et al. 2017; Y. C. Wang et al. 2020; Yuksel, Yuksel, and Bilim 2010).”
- Authenticity: The Link Between Destination Image and Place Attachment (2017, methodology): “Twelve items adapted from Kyle et al. (2005), Jorgensen and Stedman (2006), Prayag and Ryan (2012), and Yuksel, Yuksel, and Bilim (2010) were used to capture four dimensions of place attachment on a 7-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree to 7 = strongly agree).”