Intellectual property rights and innovation in developing countries

By Yongmin Chen, Thitima Puttitanun. 2005

654 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/062acadc2b23b8159f6727fd0b0cf5378359dc64

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. Diana Silva
2. E. Tebaldi
3. Xiaolan Fu
4. John Hudson
5. W. Park
6. Bruce Elmslie
7. Pierre Mohnen
8. P. Neves

In Economics and Econometrics

1. John Hudson
2. Alexandru Minea
3. P. Neves
4. Diana Silva
5. Elena Sochirca
6. Óscar Afonso
7. Keun Lee
8. E. Tebaldi

In Management of Technology and Innovation

1. John Hudson
2. Alexandru Minea
3. Diana Silva
4. P. Neves
5. Elena Sochirca
6. Óscar Afonso
7. Keun Lee
8. E. Tebaldi

Citations in the corpus

• International patent protection: 1960-2005 (2008, background): “For empirical work on IPR and innovation, see Varsakelis 2001) and Chen and Puttitanun (2005); for international trade and PR, see Smith (1999) and Co (2004); for international technology ransfer and IPR, see Javorcik (2002), Park and Lippoldt (2005), and ranstetter et al. (2006); and for the effect”
• Appropriate intellectual property protection and economic growth in countries at different levels of development (2012, background): “Schneider (2005), Chen and Puttitanun (2005), and partially with Falvey et al.”
• Intellectual Property Rights, Foreign Direct Investment, and Industrial Development (2011, neutral): “Furthermore, as is well known, under the two-stage procedure the optimal spending rule is given by : E E = r (6)”
• Does institutional quality impact innovation? Evidence from cross-country patent grant data (2013, methodology): “However, it is important to notice that the USPTO patent data produce a valid measure of innovation in the context of weak institutions because the ‘US patent system can be viewed as exogenous to any developing country’ (Chen and Puttitanun, 2005, p. 483).”
• Innovation, Intellectual Property Rights, and Economic Development: A Unified Empirical Investigation (2013, background): “Among them, Chen and Puttitanun (2005) outline a nonlinear dependence of the innovation/IPR relation on the GDP level, within a sample of developing countries.”
• The Creation and Diffusion of Innovation in Developing Countries : A Systematic Literature Review (2016, positive): “Kumar and Saqib (1996), Javorcik (2004), Shi and Pray (2012), Yang and Maskus (2009), and Yongmin and Puttitanun (2005) found similar evidence of the negative impact of weak IPRs on innovation.”
• The link between intellectual property rights, innovation, and growth: A meta-analysis (2021, methodology): “Chen and Puttitanun (2005) performed an empirical analysis on 64 developing countries about the trade-off between imitation and domestic innovation.”
• R&D and the Patent Premium (2008, neutral): “Most studies which use aggregate cross-national data find a positive and significant effect (Park and Ginarte, 1997; Kanwar and Evenson, 2003; Lederman and Maloney, 2003; Chen and Puttitanum, 2005; Falk, 2006).”
• Drivers of Entrepreneurship and Post-Entry Performance of Newborn Firms in Developing Countries (2014, neutral): “By the same token, a non-transparent regulatory environment with regard to labor market rules, taxation, red tape procedures, property rights and bankruptcy laws, is particularly harmful to firms’ growth in DCs and may be fatal for young entrepreneurial activities (see Goedhuys and Sleuwaegen 1999; ”