The COPE revised: Proposing a 5-factor model of coping strategies

By M. Zuckerman, Marylène Gagné. 2003

175 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/056ceb51435feb128df6506266920b969b1e08f3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Ruby R. Brougham
2. Christy M. Zail
3. Celeste M. Mendoza
4. Janine Miller
5. Christian U. Krägeloh

In Clinical Psychology

1. Ruby R. Brougham
2. Christy M. Zail
3. Celeste M. Mendoza
4. Janine Miller
5. Christian U. Krägeloh

In Social Psychology

1. Ruby R. Brougham
2. Christy M. Zail
3. Ming-Yueh Hwang
4. Celeste M. Mendoza
5. Pei-Hsin Lin
6. Jong-Chao Hong
7. Janine Miller
8. Kai-Hsin Tai

Citations in the corpus

• Stress, Sex Differences, and Coping Strategies Among College Students (2009, methodology): “Thus, greater use of emotion-focused strategies might be the result of college women’s socialization, acceptance of traditional sex roles, and the tendency for women to “tend and befriend” (Dyson and Renk 2006; Zuckerman and Gagne 2003).”
• Intrinsic motivation of Chinese learning in predicting online learning self-efficacy and flow experience relevant to students’ learning progress (2017, background): “According to CATLM, the interplay of cognitive and affective variables can be considered as involving situational self-efficacy (Zuckerman & Gagne, 2003), learners’ motivational traits (Amabile, Hill, Hennessey, & Tighe, 1994), flow experience, and learning outcomes (Choi, Kim, & Kim, 2007).”
• A Systematic Review of Studies Using the Brief COPE: Religious Coping in Factor Analyses (2011, background): “Other researchers have since reported a three-factor structure [9,12,13], or modified the questionnaire and proposed a five-factor structure [14].”