Using diversity indices to measure changes in prey choice at the Shag River Mouth site, southern New Zealand

95 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Archaeological Record of Human Impacts on Animal Populations (2001, unknown): “…May 30, 2001 19:18 Style file version Nov. 19th, 1999 Human Impacts on Animal Populations 13 predation similar in many ways to that found by Nagaoka (2000, 2001) is shown by faunal sequences from very high elevation (3,170–3,850 m) archaeological sites in the White Mountains of…”
Evolutionary Foraging Models in Zooarchaeological Analysis: Recent Applications and Future Challenges (2007, background): “…decrease in abundance, foragers may respond by incorporating lower-ranking but locally available prey (or patches) into the diet, increasing the number of patches used and/or intensifying how prey (or patches) are exploited (Broughton 1994a, b, 1997, 1999; Cannon 2000; Nagaoka 2001, 2002a, b).”
Dietary evenness, prey choice, and human–environment interactions (2004, unknown): “Recent papers have also shown that evenness can be a useful measure within optimal foraging-based studies of human–environment interactions [19,21, 28 ,36].”
Prey Body Size and Ranking in Zooarchaeology: Theory, Empirical Evidence, and Applications from the Northern Great Basin (2011, background): “…equal, faunas deposited by foragers with wide diet breadths and low foraging efficiencies should be represented by many prey types, with more equal distributions of abundances across them (Grayson 1991; Grayson and Delpech 1998; Jones 2004; Nagaoka 2001; but see also Broughton and Grayson 1993).”