A typological study of stress ‘deafness’

By Sharon Peperkamp, Emmanuel Dupoux. 2002

194 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/042266816f5b0c59ce48ec3e60933856c0b01f08

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Connie K. So
2. Anne Cutler
3. Catherine T. Best
4. E. Akker
5. Kazuya Saito
6. Rachel Hayes-Harb
7. Thomas Schatz
8. María Luisa García Lecumberri

Citations in the corpus

• PHONETIC INFLUENCES ON ENGLISH AND FRENCH LISTENERS’ ASSIMILATION OF MANDARIN TONES TO NATIVE PROSODIC CATEGORIES (2014, background): “…diffi - culty perceiving lexical stress patterns, even if they have become fl uent L2 speakers of a stress-accent language (e.g., Spanish or English; Dupoux, Pallier, Sebastian, & Mehler, 1997 ; Dupoux & Peperkamp, 2002 ; Dupoux, Peperkamp, & Sebastian-Galles, 2010 ; Peperkamp & Dupoux, 2002 ).”
• Prosodic cues to semantic structure in native and nonnative listening (2003, background): “There are studies of word-level prosodic processing by nonnative listeners; thus stress distinctions are difficult for speakers of non-stress languages to process, and, especially, to retain in memory (Dupoux, Pallier, Sebastián-Gallés and Mehler, 1997; Peperkamp and Dupoux, 2002), as are tone disti”