Prosodic cues to semantic structure in native and nonnative listening

By E. Akker, Anne Cutler. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 2003

119 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ef178fe263cf7670006dfb121987bf05db1e52da

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Harald Clahsen
2. Claudia Felser
3. Larry Vandergrift
4. Anne Cutler
5. Martin P. Cooke
6. María Luisa García Lecumberri
7. A. Sorace
8. Christine Goh

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Claudia Felser
2. Harald Clahsen
3. Larry Vandergrift
4. Martin P. Cooke
5. María Luisa García Lecumberri
6. Anne Cutler
7. Ian Cunnings

In Language and Linguistics

1. Claudia Felser
2. Harald Clahsen
3. Larry Vandergrift
4. Martin P. Cooke
5. María Luisa García Lecumberri
6. Anne Cutler
7. Christine Goh
8. Jeremy Cross

Citations in the corpus

• Recent developments in second and foreign language listening comprehension research (2007, background): “Mapping of prosody to semantics appears to be less efficient for L2 listeners (Akker & Cutler 2003).”
• Non-native speech perception in adverse conditions: A review (2010, background): “A similar L2 disadvantage can be seen with the processing of idioms (Vanlancker-Sidtis, 2003; Cieslicka, 2006), and with prosodic processing, at the word level (Tremblay, 2008), at the phrasal level (Harley, Howard & Hart, 1995), and at the semantic level (Akker and Cutler, 2003).”
• Grammatical processing in language learners (2006, background): “Late L2 learners also appear to be less efficient in using prosodic cues to interpretation than adult native speakers (Akker & Cutler, 2003).”