Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: Attributes and review criteria

By K. Lohr. Quality of Life Research, 2002

2,344 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management Science and Operations Research, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/03f3e9b62b24e3e37346011cfac8e850fc9267ec

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. L. Mokkink
2. Lex M. Bouter
3. HC de Vet
4. C. Terwee
5. Jordi Alonso
6. C. Prinsen
7. D.walaa badawy
8. S. Galea

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. L. Mokkink
2. C. Terwee
3. Lex M. Bouter
4. HC de Vet
5. Jordi Alonso
6. C. Prinsen
7. D.walaa badawy
8. A. Chiarotto

In Sociology and Political Science

1. C. Terwee
2. L. Mokkink
3. Lex M. Bouter
4. HC de Vet
5. C. Prinsen
6. D.walaa badawy
7. S. Galea
8. Jordi Alonso

Citations in the corpus

• COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (2017, methodology): “Apart from the COSMIN methodology to assess the quality of PROMs, other guidelines exist, such as the standards of the American Psychological Association (APA), the attributes and criteria of the Scientific Advisory Committee of the Medical Outcome Trust (SAC-MOS) [14], the Evaluating the Measuremen”