Generalized KYP lemma: unified frequency domain inequalities with design applications
By Tetsuya Iwasaki, Shinji Hara. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2005
1,062 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computational Theory and Mathematics, Control and Systems Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/03d298142b1b23ff53c435310ccee3618fa71043
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computational Theory and Mathematics
- Guanghong Yang
- Huijun Gao
- Heng Wang
- A. L. Likhtarnikov
- Sergei V. Gusev
- Xiaojian Li
- E. Rogers
- K. Gałkowski
In Control and Systems Engineering
- Guanghong Yang
- Lixian Zhang
- Huijun Gao
- Xiaojian Li
- Heng Wang
- A. L. Likhtarnikov
- Sergei V. Gusev
- Wojciech Paszke
Citations in the corpus
- Active Suspension Control With Frequency Band Constraints and Actuator Input Delay (2012, background): “Recently, a significant development made by Iwasaki and Hara is the generalized Kalman–Yakubovich–Popov (KYP) lemma [23] that establishes the equivalence between a frequency domain property and a linear matrix inequality (LMI) over a finitefrequency range, allowing designers to impose performance re”
- Finite Frequency $H_{\infty }$ Control for Vehicle Active Suspension Systems (2011, background): “The space of square-integrable vector functions over is denoted by , and for , its norm is given by .”
- From Noisy Data to Feedback Controllers: Nonconservative Design via a Matrix S-Lemma (2020, background): “A generalized S-lemma involving more general types of multipliers was considered in [44], [45], and was shown to be non-conservative under extra assumptions.”
- A finite frequency approach to filter design for uncertain discrete‐time systems (2008, background): “Lemma 1 (Generalized KYP lemma, Iwasaki and Hara [26]) Considering system (5), let a symmetric matrix ∈R(n+nz)×(n+nz) be given, the following statements are equivalent: (i) The finite frequency inequality [G(ej ) I ] [ G(ej )∗ I ] <0 ∀ ∈ (7) where is defined in Table I. (ii) There exist Hermitian ma”
- Experimentally verified generalized KYP Lemma based iterative learning control design (2016, background): “Based on results in (Iwasaki and Hara, 2005), the decision variables P̂h and Q̂h have to be Hermitian matrices.”
- Robust finite frequency range iterative learning control design and experimental verification (2013, methodology): “As emphasized in Iwasaki and Hara (2007), the main use of the generalized KYP lemma is to compute a control law that allows the designer to specify the desired shape of the closed-loop frequency response in specified frequency ranges without the use of frequency gridding and weighting filters.”
- A finite frequency domain approach to fault detection observer design for linear continuous‐time systems (2008, methodology): “2 H index via GKYP lemma The generalized KYP Lemma [17] gives a necessary and sufficient condition for a given transfer function to satisfy a required frequency domain property over a finite frequency range in terms of a linear matrix inequality condition.”
- Fault detection in finite frequency domains for multi‐delay uncertain systems with application to ground vehicle (2015, methodology): “According to [11], ! is also able to characterize high frequency and middle frequency ranges.”
- Kalman-Popov-Yakubovich lemma and the S-procedure: A historical essay (2006, methodology): “Examples of using the generalization of the Kalman–Popov–Yakubovich lemma described in this section for the problems of control are presented in [99, 100, 201].”
- Feedback control synthesis of multiple frequency domain specifications via generalized KYP lemma (2007, background): “It has been demonstrated that the GKYP lemma is effective for several engineering design problems, including open-loop shaping for feedback control synthesis, digital filter design, and structure/ control design integration [7, 9, 10].”
- Robust PID control using generalized KYP synthesis: direct open-loop shaping in multiple frequency ranges (2006, background): “We first summarize the GKYP results [15] without proofs.”