VARIATION IN TRIAL PENALTIES AMONG SERIOUS VIOLENT OFFENSES
By Jeffery T. Ulmer, Mindy Bradley. 2006
189 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/03b0947b5bd7c648dfc97b6e21edb23b70b77b7b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
- Jeffery T. Ulmer
- James Eisenstein
- Brian David Johnson
- Eric P. Baumer
- D. Mears
- Xia Wang
- S. Bushway
- A. Piehl
In Sociology and Political Science
- Jeffery T. Ulmer
- James Eisenstein
- Brian David Johnson
- Eric P. Baumer
- D. Mears
- Xia Wang
- J. Wooldredge
- S. Bushway
Citations in the corpus
- Recent Developments and New Directions in Sentencing Research (2012, background): “Other research has examined whether trial penalties are conditioned by offense severity, criminal history, offense type, as well as race/ethnicity and gender (Ulmer & Bradley, 2006; Ulmer et al., 2010), and how race/ethnic effects are conditioned by mode of conviction (Johnson, 2003).”
- Trial Penalties in Federal Sentencing: Extra‐Guidelines Factors and District Variation (2010, background): “Research on state courts shows that case-processing efficiency is indeed an organizationally valued goal (Dixon, 1995; Eisenstein & Jacob, 1977; Engen & Steen, 2000), and that it can be associated with differences in guilty pleas and trial penalties (Ulmer & Bradley, 2006; Ulmer & Johnson, 2004).”