Bringing stakeholder values into environmental policy choices: a community-based estuary case study

By R. Gregory, K. Wellman. 2001

228 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Ocean Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0379f958b8982b5d32f7790bd348bca5e34e2c2c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

In Ocean Engineering

Citations in the corpus

Environmental decision making with conflicting social groups: A case study of the Lar rangeland in Iran (2010, methodology): “criteria at the same time (Azadi et al., 2007; Gregory and Wellman, 2001; Gregory et al., 2006; Ruto and Garrod, 2004; Trainor, 2006; Wilson and Hoehn, 2006).”
From comparative risk assessment to multi-criteria decision analysis and adaptive management: recent developments and applications. (2006, background): “…and power generation, while a number of other analyses (Gregory and Failing, 2002; Hämäläinen et al., 2001; Marttunen and Hämäläinen, 1995; Gregory and Wellman, 2001; McDaniels, 1999; Gregory et al., 2001; Whitaker and Focht, 2001) seek to optimize water use planning using MAUT, AHP, and…”
A Theoretical Approach to Deliberative Valuation: Aggregation by Mutual Consent (2006, background): “One notable exception is the work of Gregory and Wellman (2001), who analyzed stakeholder values regarding the costs and benefits of wetlands restoration in the Tillamook Bay estuary in coastal Oregon.”
Application of Multicriteria Decision Analysis in Environmental Decision Making (2005, background): “Specific applications include water resource management (McDaniels et al. 1999; Gregory et al. 2001), mining (Gregory and Keeny 1994), wilderness preservation (McDaniels and Roessler 1998), and estuary management (Gregory and Wellman 2001).”
Deliberative Monetary Valuation: In Search of a Democratic and Value Plural Approach to Environmental Policy (2013, methodology): “Respondents may, for example, be guided through a structured thinking process designed in accordance with multi-attribute utility theory (MAUT; Gregory et al., 1993; Gregory, 2000; Gregory and Wellman, 2001).”
Benefit relevant indicators: Ecosystem services measures that link ecological and social outcomes (2018, unknown): “…such as MAUA can be useful for planning processes and can reveal options that produce the highest ecosystem services benefits for a given amount of spending, even when benefits cannot be monetized (Wainger et al., 2010; Arvai and Gregory, 2003; Gregory and Wellman, 2001; Linkov et al., 2004).”
Deliberative monetary valuation (DMV): Issues in combining economic and political processes to value environmental change (2007, background): “This is the use of formal deliberation concerning an environmental impact to expressvalueinmonetarytermsforpolicypurposes,andmore specificallyasaninputtoCBA(Spash,2001b).Arangeofpapers have recently appeared on this topic (e.g., Gregory and Wellman, 2001; Niemeyer and Spash, 2001; Spash, 2001b; Ma”
Identifying public preferences for land preservation using the analytic hierarchy process (2002, background): “The MAUT basis is increasingly being employed in ecological economics ( Gregory and Wellman, 2001 ) as researchers seek to ask ever-more complex questions of the public.”
Discourse-based valuation of ecosystem services: establishing fair outcomes through group deliberation (2002, methodology): “Gregory and Wellman (2001) recently used a structured group process to elicit estimates of social willingness to pay for alternative management strategies in Tillamook Bay, Oregon, USA.”
Integrating Multiple Perspectives in Social Multicriteria Evaluation of Flood-Mitigation Alternatives: The Case of Malborghetto-Valbruna (2008, methodology): “…to integrate social aspects in SMCE, different methods and techniques can be used, such as surveys, discourse based evaluation, narrative analysis, and value integration methods (e.g. in the case of flood related issues: Gregory and Wellman, 2001; Morris-Oswald and Sinclair, 2005; Simonovic, 2005).”
Integrated Ecosystem Assessments: Developing the Scientific Basis for Ecosystem-Based Management of the Ocean (2009, background): “Gregory and Wellman [ 22] discuss a comprehensive scoping process for Tillamook Bay, Oregon.”