Identifying public preferences for land preservation using the analytic hierarchy process

By J. Duke, Rhonda Aull-Hyde. 2002

275 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Public attitudes towards the environmental impact of salmon aquaculture in Scotland (2006, background): “Given that there is likely to be some inconsistency in the paired comparisons made subjectively by individual respondents, the priority weights can be found by solving the eigenvalue problem (Saaty, 1977; Duke and Aull-Hyde, 2002; Mardle and Pascoe, 2003; Jones and Mardle, 2004):”
What does the public want from agriculture and the countryside? A review of evidence and methods (2004, methodology): “(2002) and Duke and Aull-Hyde (2002) report on a study concerning public preferences for land preservation in Delaware, USA.”
A critical review of multi-criteria decision making methods with special reference to forest management and planning (2009, background): “Duke and Aull-Hyde (2002) is the only application where the general public (in the form of a sample of 129 respondents) were involved in identifying preferences for farmland preservation in Delaware.”