Examining a Multidimensional Model of Eating Disorder Symptomatology among College Women.

By Tracy Lynn Tylka, L. Subich. 2004

182 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Marketing

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/031b5d9d11505a992f43a1b524496e3d28b08ded

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Marketing

Citations in the corpus

Integrating Social Comparison Theory and Self-Esteem within Objectification Theory to Predict Women’s Disordered Eating (2010, background): “Low self-esteem predicts body dissatisfaction among college women ( Tylka and Subich 2004 ) and low self-esteem is associated with body shame among exotic dancers (Downs et al. 2006) and college women (Mercurio and Landry 2008) from the U.S.”
The Body Appreciation Scale: development and psychometric evaluation. (2005, methodology): “Tylka and Subich (2004) also used this scoring method.”
A Brief Guide to Structural Equation Modeling (2006, background): “…in seeing additional examples of how SEM is being applied in the counseling psychology literature should refer to recent publications (e.g., Geurts, Kompier, Roxburgh, & Houtman, 2003; Heppner, Pretorious, Wei, Lee, & Wang, 2002; Long, 1998; Martens & Hasse, in press; Tylka & Subich, 2004).”
Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Interpersonal Sexual Objectification Scale (2007, unknown): “Factor analyses have indicated that all 8 items load highly on one factor, supporting its unidimensionality, and strong relations with measures of similar content support the subscale’s convergent validity (Heinberg et al., 1995; Tylka & Subich, 2004).”
A Test of Objectification Theory with Lesbian Women (2006, methodology): “Its construct validity is supported with college women, as it was strongly related to difficulty identifying feelings (Tylka & Subich, 2004).”
A Test and Extension of Objectification Theory as It Predicts Disordered Eating: Does Women's Age Matter?. (2009, methodology): “Other researchers (e.g., Tylka & Hill, 2004; Tylka & Subich, 2004) have used this scoring method within the literature.”
Exploring a Model and Moderators of Disordered Eating with Asian American College Women. (2006, methodology): “I is unidimensional and yields evidence of internal consistency reliability (e.g., .88; Heinberg et al., 1995) and convergent validity due to its strong relation to another measure assessing internalization of the thin ideal (Tylka & Subich, 2004).”
Are Intuitive Eating and Eating Disorder Symptomatology Opposite Poles of the Same Construct (2006, background): “Some counseling psychologists have addressed adaptive eating behaviors as part of the ED continuum framework (e.g., Mintz & Betz, 1988; Tylka & Subich, 1999, 2003, 2004); however, adaptive eating in this context is defined merely as the absence of ED symptoms.”
Exploring a model of intuitive eating with college women. (2006, background): “…the previous theory that perceptions of general unconditional acceptance influence perceptions of acceptance in more specific domains (e.g., the body; Rogers, 1961) and research findings that perceived social support is negatively related to perceived pressure to lose weight (Tylka & Subich, 2004).”
Development and psychometric evaluation of a measure of intuitive eating. (2006, methodology): “These scales typically have been used in research to assess their respective constructs (Tylka & Subich, 2004).”
Objectification Theory Predicts College Women’s Attitudes Toward Cosmetic Surgery (2010, background): “…negatively associated with experiences of sexual objectification (American Psychological Association Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls 2007; Tylka and Subich 2004), self-objectification and self-surveillance (Aubrey 2006; Mercurio and Landry 2008; Tolman et al. 2006), and body shame…”
The Intuitive Eating Scale-2: item refinement and psychometric evaluation with college women and men. (2013, methodology): “The continuous scoring method was followed because it utilizes the full range of responses, which reduces skewness in the distribution of scores due to the relatively low base rate of clinical eating disorders (e.g., Mazzeo, 1999; Tylka & Subich, 2004).”