Exploring a model of intuitive eating with college women.
By Laura C. Avalos, Tracy Lynn Tylka. 2006
375 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f2566350464f4ecd3293b643c1c6e03c007c16d0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
- Tracy Lynn Tylka
- Bonnie Moradi
- Rachel M. Calogero
- Nichole L. Wood-Barcalow
- Yu-Ping Huang
- Ashley M Kroon Van Diest
- Afroditi Pina
- Lora E. Park
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Nichole L. Wood-Barcalow
- Rachel M. Calogero
- Zara Rahemtulla
- Lora E. Park
- Afroditi Pina
- Yu-Ping Huang
- Ashley M Kroon Van Diest
- Bonnie Moradi
In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Nichole L. Wood-Barcalow
- Rachel M. Calogero
- Zara Rahemtulla
- Lora E. Park
- Afroditi Pina
- Yu-Ping Huang
- Bonnie Moradi
- Tracy Lynn Tylka
Citations in the corpus
- Objectification Theory and Psychology of Women: A Decade of Advances and Future Directions (2008, background): “Although most of the studies reviewed thus far focused on negative experiences and outcomes, a unique study by Avalos and Tylka (2006) explored the relations among experiences of body acceptance from others, body surveillance, and healthy intuitive eating.”
- What is and what is not positive body image? Conceptual foundations and construct definition. (2015, methodology): “Many studies on cultural variations in positive body mage using the BAS (Avalos et al., 2005) have been conducted by wami and colleagues (Ng, Barron, & Swami, 2015; see Tiggemann, 015, in this issue, for a review). This research has revealed that here are likely differences in the concept and experi”
- Objectification Theory Predicts College Women’s Attitudes Toward Cosmetic Surgery (2010, methodology): “For example, drawing from Avalos and Tylka’s (2006) model of intuitive eating, environmental contexts that foster body acceptance (as opposed to body objectification) promote more intuitive eating among women because these contexts direct women’s attention more toward how their bodies feel and funct”
- No harm in looking, right? Men’s pornography consumption, body image, and well-being. (2015, methodology): “A model of body appreciation (Avalos & Tylka, 2006) serves as the basis for Model 2.”
- Differences in functional and aesthetic body image between sedentary girls and girls involved in sports and physical activity: Does sport type make a difference? (2011, background): “A sense of physical competence has been associated with positive feelings towards the body (Greenleaf, Boyer & Petrie, 2009) and a focus on body function has also been associated with greater body appreciation and intuitive eating (Avalos & Tylka, 2006).”
- The Intuitive Eating Scale-2: item refinement and psychometric evaluation with college women and men. (2013, background): “Further, because those who respect and appreciate their bodies are more aware of their bodily needs, including their hunger and satiety signals, and eat according to those signals (Avalos & Tylka, 2006), IES-2 scores were hypothesized to be positively related to body appreciation.”