Projecting sensations to external objects: evidence from skin conductance response
By K. Armel, Vilayanur S. Ramachandran. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 2003
853 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/02e028d82cb4b973a1b668244dee377a68f308f4
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Mel Slater
- H. Ehrsson
- Konstantina Kilteni
- Maria V. Sanchez-Vives
- Manos Tsakiris
- Daniel Pérez-Marcos
- Raphaela Groten
- Hayelom Gebrekirstos Mengesha
Citations in the corpus
- Habeas Corpus: The Sense of Ownership of One ' s Own Body (2007, background): “This assertion is not metaphorical as subjects showed stronger skin condu ctance reactions when the fake arm was injured after synchronous stimulation compared to asynchronous stimulation ( Armel and Ramachandran, 2003 ).”
- First Person Experience of Body Transfer in Virtual Reality (2010, methodology): “We rendered our animation in this way because previous work on ownership has shown that threat-like behavior is often associated with physiological changes [2], [9], [14], [35].”
- The Sense of Embodiment in Virtual Reality (2012, background): “Physiological responses to threat; for example, SCR (Armel & Ramachandran, 2003; Honma, Koyama, & Osada, 2009; Petkova & Ehrsson, 2008; Petkova et al., 2011; Yuan & Steed, 2010), Heart Rate Deceleration (Slater, Spanlang, Sanchez-Vives, et al., 2010).”
- Towards a Digital Body: The Virtual Arm Illusion (2008, background): “For example Armel and Ramachandran (2003) have shown that skin conductance responses were associated with manipulations of the rubber hand that would normally cause pain.”
- Full-body illusions and minimal phenomenal selfhood. (2009, background): “The RHI is abolishedwhenthestrokingisasynchronous[ 32 ,33].Brain imaging studies associated the RHI with bilateral activations in several brain regions [34,35], yet this is only partly compatible with data on somatoparaphrenia that highlight the importance of temporo-parietal cortex and the right he”
- Phantom percepts: Tinnitus and pain as persisting aversive memory networks (2011, background): “Whereas synchronous stimulation of external objects, such as a rubber hand, can lead to the illusion of body ownership (70), asynchronous stimulation in one sensory modality or between the senses can lead to abnormal sensory perception (71, 72).”
- The building blocks of the full body ownership illusion (2013, background): “…having 3PP for those cases in which the fake limb position violates constraints from 1PP, i.e., when the limb is outside the peripersonal space (Armel and Ramachandran, 2003; Lloyd, 2007) or in anatomically impossible configurations, e.g., at 180◦ (Ehrsson, 2004) and when handendness does not…”
- Touching a rubber hand: feeling of body ownership is associated with activity in multisensory brain areas (2005, background): “The timing of the touches was irregular (i.e., not isochronous) because pilot experiments had shown that this caused a more vivid illusion than regular tapping (Armel and Ramachandran, 2003).”
- Place illusion and plausibility can lead to realistic behaviour in immersive virtual environments (2009, background): “Recent research activity in cognitive neuro-science concerned with body ownership is based on the paradigm called the ‘rubber hand illusion’ (Botvinick & Cohen 1998; Pavani et al. 2000; Armel & Ramachandran 2003; Tsakiris & Haggard 2005).”
- My body in the brain: a neurocognitive model of body-ownership. (2010, unknown): “…a wooden stick (i.e. coding of visual form representations of body-parts, Haans, Ijsselsteijn & de Kort, 2008; Tsakiris & Haggard 2005; Tsakiris, Costantini & Haggard 2008, see also Holmes, Snijders, & Spence, 2006; see also Graziano, Cooke and Taylor 2000, but cf. Armel and Ramachandran 2003).”
- If I Were You: Perceptual Illusion of Body Swapping (2008, unknown): “This test has been used before to provide physiological evidence of body illusions [24,25], and there is a direct relationship between the degree of anxiety evoked by threatening an artificial body part and the strength of illusory body ownership [25].”
- What is embodiment? A psychometric approach. (2008, unknown): “The rubber hand illusion provides one of the few means of manipulating embodiment, and has been so used in a number of recent studies (Armel & Ramachandran, 2003; Austen, Soto-Faraco, Enns, & Kingstone, 2004; Costantini & Haggard, 2007; Durgin, Evans, Dunphy, Klostermann , & Simmons, 2007; Ehrsson,…”
- MSc Thesis (2011, background): “5 minutes to obtain a ’compelling illusion’ [21].”