Attention to behavioral events during interaction: two actor-observer gaps and three attempts to close them.

By Bertram F. Malle, G. Pearce. 2001

95 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciences (2017, background): “Malle and Pearce [118] break the actions that people will explain into two dimensions: (1) intentional vs. unintentional ; and (2) observable vs. unobservable; thus creating four different classifications (see Figure 6).”
Time to Give Up the Dogmas of Attribution (2011, unknown): “Many self–other differences have been documented, such as in attention (Malle & Pearce, 2001; Sheldon & Johnson, 1993), memory (Rogers, Kuiper, & Kirker, 1977), and personality description (Locke, 2002; Sande, Goethals, & Radloff, 1988).”
Valuing thoughts, ignoring behavior: The introspection illusion as a source of the bias blind spot (2007, background): “…qualities but to describe others in terms of public and observable ones (McGuire & McGuire, 1986; Prentice, 1990), and the tendency for people to describe social interactions in terms of private reactions in the case of self but public responses in the case of others (Malle & Pearce, 2001).”
Morality and competence in person- and self-perception (2005, background): “The actor – observer distinction has continued to inspire research over the 30 years since its introduction (e.g., Kruger & Gilovich, 2004; Malle & Pearce, 2001; Storms, 1973).”