Moving to Opportunity and Tranquility: Neighborhood Effects on Adult Economic Self-Sufficiency and Health From a Randomized Housing Voucher Experiment
By Jeffrey R. Kling, Jeffrey B. Liebman, Lawrence F. Katz, L. Sanbonmatsu. 2004
191 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: General Health Professions, Health, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/02b65e6340a3c38bd8a10000efd75e6e48937427
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In General Health Professions
- R. Chaskin
- Susan E. Clampet-Lundquist
- F. Gallego
- Miriam Bruhn
- Michael Kremer
- Daniel Shoag
- G. Duncan
- Katherine A. Magnuson
In Health
- A. Bolster
- Susan E. Clampet-Lundquist
- F. Gallego
- Ron Johnston
- Miriam Bruhn
- Simon Burgess
- G. Duncan
- Kelvyn Jones
In Sociology and Political Science
- Katherine A. Magnuson
- Stefanie DeLuca
- A. Bolster
- David Yanagizawa-Drott
- Susan E. Clampet-Lundquist
- F. Gallego
- Ron Johnston
- Miriam Bruhn
Citations in the corpus
- Growing up in a Recession (2014, unknown): “We computed the AES following Kling et al. (2004).”
- Power to the People: Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment of a Community-Based Monitoring Project in Uganda (2007, unknown): “To form judgment about the impact of the intervention on a family of K related outcomes, we follow Kling et al. (2004) and estimate a seemingly unrelated regression system,”
- Poverty, Policy, and Place: How Poverty and Policies to Alleviate Poverty Are Shaped by Local Characteristics (2005, background): “Evidence from the MTO studies are still being analyzed but provide the best available information on the impact of urban neighborhood effects on low-income family outcomes (Orr et al. 2003; Kling et al. 2004; Kling, Ludwig, and Katz forthcoming).”
- The role of family socioeconomic resources in the black-white test score gap among young children (2006, background): “Another possible explanation is that while MTO-related neighborhood advantages appeared to improve the mental health of mothers, they did not translate into other kinds of household resources or advantages that might have improved children’s well-being (Kling et al., 2004; Orr et al., 2003).”
- USING RANDOMIZATION IN DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS RESEARCH: A TOOLKIT (2008, background): “1 Kremer (2003) and Glewwe and Kremer (2006) provide a review of randomized evaluations in education;”
- Unappreciated Service: Performance, Perceptions, and Women Leaders in India (2004, unknown): “The standard error for these averages is derived from the variance covariance matrix for the 5 coefficients obtained from jointly estimating the equations for the 5 public goods (see Katz, Kling and Liebman (2004)).”
- The Theoretical Basis for Addressing Poverty Through Mixed-Income Development (2007, background): “The increased sense of security appears to lead to mental health benefits (Kling et al. 2004).”
- Crime and Mental Well-Being (2014, unknown): “Based on the Moving to Opportunity (MTO) experiment, Katz, Kling and Liebman (2001); Kling, Liebman and Katz (2001); and Kling et al. (2004) do just that.”
- Neighbors as Negatives: Relative Earnings and Well-Being (2005, unknown): “In their study of the randomized Moving to Opportunity experiment, Kling et al. [2004] find that individuals moving to lower-poverty census tracts report lower levels of psychological distress. Thus, for mental health measures such as depression or psychological distress, the benefits associated wit”
- Do Political Protests Matter? Evidence from the Tea Party Movement* (2013, methodology): “To evaluate the likelihood of finding so many consistent results, we follow the method used in Kling et al. (2004), Kling, Liebman, and Katz (2007), and Clingingsmith, Khwaja, and 30.”
- Neighbourhoods, Households and Income Dynamics: A Semi-Parametric Investigation of Neighbourhood Effects (2004, methodology): “Allowing for a longer elapsed time (5 years), Kling et al (2004) using MTO data find no significant overall effects on adult employment, earnings, or welfare receipt4.”