The Influence of Approach and Avoidance Cues on Attentional Flexibility
By R. Friedman, Jens Förster. 2005
95 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/022ad62a20eec71d7f1dd471b5b5ca9cf510ed6b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- B. Nijstad
- Eric Rietzschel
- Matthijs Baas
- C. D. De Dreu
- L. Dannenberg
- Kai Sassenberg
- Karl‐Andrew Woltin
- Jens Förster
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- B. Nijstad
- Eric Rietzschel
- Matthijs Baas
- C. D. De Dreu
- L. Dannenberg
- Kai Sassenberg
- Karl‐Andrew Woltin
- Jens Förster
Citations in the corpus
- Group-based self-regulation: The effects of regulatory focus (2008, background): “This prediction is in line with the more general findings that executive performance (as, for example, measured by the Stroop colournaming task) is higher in a promotion than in a prevention focus (Friedman & Förster, 2005b).”
- The dual pathway to creativity model: Creative ideation as a function of flexibility and persistence (2010, background): “These findings ran counter to the viewpoint that focused, systematic, or analytical thinking is incompatible with creativity (e.g., Friedman & Förster, 2005; Martindale, 1995).”
- GLOMOsys: A Systems Account of Global Versus Local Processing (2010, background): “…Förster, Friedman, Özelsel, & Denzler, 2006) and conceptual attention (e.g., creativity, category breadth and similarity search; Förster, 2009; Friedman & Förster, 2001, 2002, 2005): global processing occurred after a promotion focus was induced, whereas local processing resulted after…”