Modeling the excitability of mammalian nerve fibers: influence of afterpotentials on the recovery cycle.
By Cameron C. McIntyre, Andrew G. Richardson, W. Grill. Journal of Neurophysiology, 2002
786 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/02247554f03395fc8da37446bef7f8ed371c9c9f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
Citations in the corpus
- Patient-specific analysis of the volume of tissue activated during deep brain stimulation (2007, background): “7 μm) myelinated axons (McIntyre et al., 2002; Butson and McIntyre, 2006), and may not be representative of the response of other neuron types surrounding the electrode (local projection neurons, local interneurons, afferent inputs, etc.”
- Cellular effects of deep brain stimulation: model-based analysis of activation and inhibition. (2004, background): “distribution and was able to capture nearly every experimentally recorded firing property of myelinated axons [McIntyre et al., 2002].”
- Mechanisms of axon ensheathment and myelin growth (2005, result): “Decreased internodal lengths did reduce rates of conduction in accordance with predictions from a recent, rather sophisticated mathematical mode”
- Computational analysis of subthalamic nucleus and lenticular fasciculus activation during therapeutic deep brain stimulation. (2006, methodology): “The axon of the STN neuron and the GPi and CST axons were based on the myelinated axon model originally described by McIntyre et al. (2002).”