Cellular effects of deep brain stimulation: model-based analysis of activation and inhibition.

By Cameron C. McIntyre, W. Grill, D. Sherman, Nitish V. Thakor. Journal of Neurophysiology, 2004

842 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Lead-DBS v2: Towards a comprehensive pipeline for deep brain stimulation imaging (2018, neutral): “Such studies have been conducted (Åström et al., 2014; Dembek et al., 2017; Fillard et al., 2011; Klein et al., 2009; Maier-Hein et al., 2017; McIntyre et al., 2004) and are currently underway in context of the Lead-DBS environment, as well (Ewert et al.”
Physiological and modeling evidence for focal transcranial electrical brain stimulation in humans: A basis for high-definition tDCS (2013, methodology): “, 2005), and solving of the Laplace equation for each frequency (see Fourier-FEM approach, (Butson andMcIntyre, 2005)), followed by detailed biophysical modeling using the activation function/multi-compartmentmodeling with distributed voltage-gated ion channels considering different cell classes (Mc”
Uncovering the mechanism(s) of action of deep brain stimulation: activation, inhibition, or both. (2004, background): “McIntyre et al. / Clinical Neurophysiology 115 (2004) 1239–1248 1243”
Computational analysis of subthalamic nucleus and lenticular fasciculus activation during therapeutic deep brain stimulation. (2006, methodology): “It should also be noted that the 3D complex tissue anisotropy around the STN can affect the neural response to DBS (McIntyre et al. 2004b).”