Qualitative Research in Counseling Psychology
By Susan L. Morrow. 2007
631 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0210c5c348fe6bd884f9cf3624bdc8e4aaa6d823
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
In Social Psychology
- K. Nadal
- Christine J. Yeh
- A. Inman
- J. Ponterotto
- Yinglee Wong
- Peter Mcilveen
- I. Grieger
- V. P. Plano Clark
Citations in the corpus
- Mormon Clients’ Experiences of Conversion Therapy (2004, methodology): “Qualitative research methods can “more clearly capture the complexity and meaningfulness of human behavior and experience” (Morrow & Smith, 2000, p. 199) by permitting more openness to findings and accessing participants’ full descriptions of their realities (Miles & Huberman, 1994).”
- Sexual Orientation Microaggressions: “Death by a Thousand Cuts” for Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Youth (2011, background): “When seeking rich data, particularly on unstudied topics, qualitative meth-ods can provide an appropriate approach to answering research questions (Morrow & Smith, 2000).”
- Evaluating Qualitative Research for Social Work Practitioners (2010, background): “These paradigmatic stances impact the way researchers conceptualize their qualitative studies (Morrow, 2007).”
- Mixed Methods Research Designs in Counseling Psychology. (2005, background): “These calls have led to important discussions about incorporating qualitative methods in counseling research and including qualitative studies in traditional publication outlets (Hoshmand, 1989; Maione & Chenail, 1999; Morrow & Smith, 2000).”
- Racial Microaggressions Against Black Americans: Implications for Counseling (2008, background): “Qualitative approaches are highly appropriate when conducting research with marginalized populations, especially when contextualizing issues of power and privilege (Morrow & Smith, 2000).”
- Interpersonal and Systemic Microaggressions Toward Transgender People: Implications for Counseling (2012, background): “The current study supported seven of the original themes in the taxonomy proposed by Nadal et al. (2010), while suggesting five additional themes of microaggressions experienced by transgender people.”
- Narrative career counselling: Theory and exemplars of practice (2007, background): “There have been, nevertheless, important methodological advances in the form of paradigms and methods appropriate for research into constructivist counselling (e.g., Morrow, 2007 ).”
- Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counseling psychology. (2005, methodology): “Another reflexive strategy is consulting with a research team or peer debriefers (Hill et al., 2005; Hill, Thompson, & Williams, 1997; Morrow & Smith, 2000), who serve as a mirror, reflecting the investigator's responses to the research process.”
- Qualitative Data Analysis and Interpretation in Counseling Psychology: Strategies for Best Practices (2007, methodology): “…triangulation have been incorporated through the use of multiple strategies for collecting evidence (focus groups, interviews, observations, etc.; Morrow & Smith, 2000; Suzuki et al., 2007 [TCP, special issue, part 3]) and through the use of separate research teams to analyze and interpret data…”
- An Examination of Individual Level Factors in Stress and Coping Processes: Perspectives of Chinese International Students in the United States (2011, methodology): “Two sampling methods were mainly employed: criterion sampling and snowball sampling (Morrow & Smith, 2000).”
- Qualitative Research Designs (2007, background): “We leave to others detailed commentary on the paradigm and theoretical views (Morrow & Smith, 2000), the historical underpinnings (Denzin & Lincoln, 2005), and the need to advocate for qualitative inquiry within counseling psychology (see Hoshmand, 1989).”
- Recommendations for Designing and Reviewing Qualitative Research in Psychology: Promoting Methodological Integrity (2017, background): “Researchers must convey sufficient information regarding the history, the setting, the participants, and the researchers themselves so that the reader can understand features of the context that might influence the findings (Morrow & Smith, 2000; Rogers, 2000).”